Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rembrandt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$22kHealth$15kReligion$13kInternational$11kEducation$10kCrime & Legal$7kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$247k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints$2,000
Turkish Philanthropy Funds$1,300
Zahra Charity$1,300
The Christian Center of Park City$1,300
RiteCare of Utah$1,300
Utah Kids Foundation$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Park City Young Life$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS: $1k → 12%Elizabeth Smart Foundation: $2k → 12%K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS: $1k → 12%PEACE HOUSE: $10k → 5%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$64k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+38%

Still filing today

27%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +86%
  • ES
    Elizabeth Smart Foundation
    2× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue -51%

Funded once

  • PH
    Peace House Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • PC
    Park City Library
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • DM
    Des Moines Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Malouf Foundation

To confront child sexual exploitation, specifically sex trafficking and online abuse. We fulfill our mission by providing education, promoting healing, and furthering advocacy for survivors.

Philanthropy
2
Maliheh Free Clinic

Maliheh Free Clinic seeks to improve the quality of life in the greater Salt Lake City area by providing free, quality medical services for uninsured and low income individuals and families to help reverse the cycle of poverty and…

Health
3
Phase Alliance

Prevention and Healing Against Sexual Exploitation (PHASE). PHASE Alliance represents three nationally recognized organizations, Fight the New Drug, the Elizabeth Smart Foundation, and the Malouf Foundation, working together to address the…

Crime & Legal
4
Mali Medical Relief Fund

We serve needy families in Mali who find themselves in medical crisis. Since our founding in 2008, we have helped hundreds of patients access life saving medical care, by paying for medicines, medical tests, and surgeries. We treat complex…

Food & Nutrition
5
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
6
Patient Safety Movement Foundation

Our mission is to disseminate actionable, evidence-based practices, advance their integration by healthcare organizations, and cultivate data transparency by 2030.

Education
7
Physicians for Palestine
Health
8
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
9
Doctors' Volunteer Clinic

To offer afforable access to healthcare for the uninsured and low income population of southern utah. the clinic acts as a safety net of services for those who live 250% below poverty level, including medical care, mental health care, and…

Health
10
Doctors for You International Co Vistex

To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.

Health
11
Kpf Foundation Co Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates Pc
Philanthropy
12
Diplomatic Security Foundation Incorporated

DSF mission: DSF provides timely financial support and charitable contributions to members of the U.S. Department of States Diplomatic Security Service, security professionals, and other colleagues in the law enforcement and foreign…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zahara Charity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $10,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF: $6,500 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OFTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS: $6,450 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDSTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $6,250 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSRiteCare of Utah: $5,500 · OtherRiteCare of UtahBlank Children's Hospital: $5,200 · OtherBlank Children's HospitalAFGHAN WOMEN'S AND KID'S: $2,500 · OtherAFGHAN WOMEN'S AND KID'S+3 more: $2,700 · Other+3 morePeace House Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesPeace House IncElizabeth Smart Foundation: $7,300 · Human ServicesElizabeth Smart FoundationK9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS: $2,000 · Human ServicesK9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTSCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $7,500 · ReligionCHRISTIAN …Zahara Charity: $4,500 · HealthTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $2,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalUtah Kids Foundation: $1,300 · EducationCharityVision International: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$45,350Human Services$19,300Religion$7,500Health$4,500International$3,000Education$1,300Philanthropy$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeace House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetElizabeth Smart Foundation: $7,300 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetK9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Kids Foundation: $1,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCharityVision International: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Smart Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Zahara Charity ↗
  • Who funds TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds K9 PARTNERS FOR PATRIOTS ↗
  • Who funds Utah Kids Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CharityVision International ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rembrandt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rembrandt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rembrandt Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rembrandt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rembrandt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph