Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Reiser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$338kHuman Services$134kReligion$47kInternational$34kPhilanthropy$18kEducation$14kCommunity Improvement$10kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
FISHER HOUSE$23,000
MOUNT SINIA HEALTH SYS FOR AUTISM$10,000
LANAIDO DEVELOPMENT FUND$10,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,000
OVERLOOK FOUNDATION$10,000
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA$7,500
SHALVA$5,000
CURE ALHEIMERS FUND$5,000
CHABAD OF ORANGE COUNTY$3,800
CENTER FOR DISCOVERY$3,500
WARWICK VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
YOUNG ISRAEL AISH$720
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEADS: $10k → 11%NEADS: $8k → 11%NEADS: $7k → 11%NEADS: $6k → 11%NEADS: $6k → 11%NEADS: $6k → 11%NEADS: $5k → 11%NEADS: $5k → 11%MOUNT SINAI HEAL TH SYSTEMS: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
NV
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$531k · 19 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$531k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+29%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +32%
  • NI
    NEADS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +53%
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Beth Israel Medical Center

Since its founding, over 120 years ago, as a medical dispensary to meet the needs of the impoverished and underserved jewish community of the lower east side, beth israel medical center has been committed to the care of persons of all…

Health
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
New York Eye & Ear Infirmary

To provide patient care at the highest quality, most technologically advanced and consistent multidisciplinary care in an environment where the safety, dignity and comfort of each patient are paramount. in delivering patient care, new york…

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Sinai Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER — $188,200 · OtherCHILTON MEDICAL CENTERFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $67,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCCURE ALHEIMERS FUND — $36,000 · OtherCURE ALHEIMERS FUNDMOUNT SINIA HEALTH SYS FOR AUTISM — $29,000 · OtherMOUNT SINIA HEALTH SYS FOR AUTISMMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $27,500 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCCHABAD OF ORANGE COUNTY — $18,140 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL — $16,405 · Other+20 more — $69,883 · Other+20 moreNEADS INC — $51,000 · Human ServicesNEADS INC+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthOVERLOOK …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $16,000 · HealthALZHEIMER…THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $8,000 · HealthTHE CENTE…THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $2,000 · Health+3 more — $2,500 · HealthJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $23,250 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $10,000 · InternationalSTEPPINGSTONE DAY SCHOOL INC — $12,000 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyWarwick Valley Humane Society Inc — $1,900 · Animals
Other$452,128Human Services$52,500Health$48,500International$33,250Education$12,000Philanthropy$3,500Animals$1,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $67,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEADS INC — $51,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $23,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE DAY SCHOOL INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarwick Valley Humane Society Inc — $1,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NEADS INC
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STEPPINGSTONE DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
  • Who funds Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Reiser Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Neads Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Reiser Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Reiser Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph