Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Reh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$226kHousing & Shelter$163kHealth$66kReligion$50kYouth Development$22kFood & Nutrition$18kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $138k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTOR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$41,088
WILLOW$25,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY$20,000
COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER$12,000
SERENITY HOUSE$10,000
HOUSE OF MERCY$10,000
ST PAUL'S SCHOOL FOR BOYS$10,000
HOPE HALL SCHOOL$10,000
ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES$8,000
VICTOR FARMINGTON FOOD CUPBOARD$8,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$7,000
441 MINISTRIES BEECHWOOD$6,000
CAMERON COMMUNITY CENTER - CAMERON COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$5,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS ROCHESTER$5,000
ST PATRICK'S CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAFE HARBORS OF THE FINGER LAKES: $4k → 10%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $8k → 14%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $5k → 14%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $5k → 14%ROCHESTER ACCESSIBLE ADVENTURES: $3k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH: $1k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $5k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $5k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $5k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $5k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $4k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $5k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $3k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $3k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $3k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $3k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $3k → 14%REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 26 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
12

Total granted

$1.5M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +54%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +222%
  • HH
    HOPE HALL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $45k · revenue +238%

Funded once

  • FE
    FLACE-VCS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • R
    RESOLVE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • VO
    VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS HOME ASSN POST NO 1599
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Housing Services of Rochester Inc

NeighborWorks Rochester collaborates with people and partners to strengthen, sustain and promote city neighborhoods. Our services are available to a wide spectrum of the community, including existing and potential homeowners, tenants and…

Housing & Shelter
2
Daemen University

Private, independent university providing higher education to students. The mission of Daemen University is to prepare creative, ethically-minded leaders for a diverse and interconnected world by integrating the intellectual strengths…

Education
3
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
4
Veterans One-Stop Center of Wny Inc

We. empower. veterans. the veterans one-stop center of wny, inc. is the region's premiere veterans service and advocacy not-for-profit collaborative agency empowering veterans, veteran families and service members in achieving economic…

Public Benefit
5
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
6
St Joseph's House of Hospitality

Our aim is to try each day to build a new society in the shell of the old as we practice the various works of mercy, and labor with whatever resources, physical as well as spiritual, that we have been given at the time.

—
7
Foundation for the Homeless Inc

Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.

—
8
Compeer Rochester Inc

Through supportive friendships, enhance the wellness of those with social and emotional barriers.

Health
9
LeMoyne-Owen College

The College is a liberal arts institution committed to fostering academic excellence and to provide high educational opportunities for a diverse population with disparate levels of academic preparation.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
12
Vocational Guidance Services

Creating pathways for individuals with disabilities to engage in the community, achieve greater independence, and attain employment.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Ontario County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ngandus Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VICTOR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $270,948 · OtherVICTOR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSCOMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER: $103,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTERWILLOW: $55,000 · OtherWILLOWHOPE HALL: $45,000 · OtherHOPE HALLST PAUL'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherST PAUL'S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $25,000 · Other+20 more: $190,332 · Other+20 moreUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $600,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER+4 more: $15,000 · EducationFAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC: $95,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF MERCY INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesREFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesRochester Accessible Adventures: $21,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBORS OF THE FINGER LAKES INC: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSERENITY HOUSE OF VICTOR INC: $35,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP FOR ONTARIO COUNTY INC: $17,500 · HealthVictor Farmington Food Cupboard Inc: $13,000 · Food & NutritionFOODLINK INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition441 Ministries Beechwood Inc: $9,000 · Religion
Other$714,280Education$615,000Housing & Shelter$95,000Human Services$82,500Health$52,500Food & Nutrition$18,000Religion$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC: $95,000 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetHOPE HALL: $45,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSERENITY HOUSE OF VICTOR INC: $35,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY INC: $33,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetST PAUL'S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES INC: $23,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetRochester Accessible Adventures: $21,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR ONTARIO COUNTY INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetVictor Farmington Food Cupboard Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget441 Ministries Beechwood Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the Finger Lakes: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS HOME ASSN POST NO 1599: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINGER LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,332 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOODLINK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPathStone Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAFE HARBORS OF THE FINGER LAKES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Youth Services Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENECA WATERWAYS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ONTARIO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HALL ↗
  • Who funds SERENITY HOUSE OF VICTOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEES HELPING REFUGEES INC ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Accessible Adventures ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR ONTARIO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Victor Farmington Food Cupboard Inc ↗
  • Who funds 441 Ministries Beechwood Inc ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocacy Center of the Finger Lakes ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS HOME ASSN POST NO 1599 ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FINGER LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMERON COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PathStone Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBORS OF THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds NGANDUS ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Rochester Health FoundationNY32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Rochester Health Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · The Florence M Muller Foundation · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Foodlink Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Glover-Crask Charitable Ta

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph