Skip to content
The Redhead Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Redhead Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$41kHousing & Shelter$26kRecreation & Sports$23kEmployment$11kEducation$10kInternational$10kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,217
Median grant
3
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND$6,218
MARIAN HOUSE$6,217
Achieve Academy$6,180
NETWORK FOR GOOD - RALLYCAP SPORTS$6,180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAS UNITE INC: $2k → 8%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $1k → 11%MARIAN HOUSE: $8k → 19%AMERICAS UNITE INC: $2k → 8%MARIAN HOUSE: $6k → 19%MARIAN HOUSE: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
MD
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 8 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$104k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+8%

Still filing today

88%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHealthEmploymentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +136%
  • MH
    MARIAN HOUSE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $19k · revenue +30%
  • JC
    JERSEY CARES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • LUNCH BREAK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
  • SS
    STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -36%
  • PH
    PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
2
City Relief Inc

City relief provides fresh, nutritious meals and essential care items to individuals in need; as well as creating individualized action plans including connections to programs,offering support and encouragement.

Human Services
3
Legal Services Nyc

Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

Crime & Legal
4
Family Kitchen

To provide nutritious meals to anyone in need in a safe and caring environment.

Food & Nutrition
5
Legal Services of New Jersey Inc

To provide and promote free and affordable civil legal assistance, advocacy and justice for low-income people and communities in new jersey.

Crime & Legal
6
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
7
Carelink Community Support Services Nj

Carelink community support services of new jersey's mission is to assist adult citizens of nj living with psychiatric disability in acquiring the tools necessary to live health and fulfilling lives.

Health
8
CaringWorks Inc

Caringworks' mission is to reduce homelessness and empower the marginalized by providing access to housing and services that foster dignity, self-sufficieny & well-being.

Human Services
9
Nourishnj Inc

Nourish.nj provides immediate access to healthy food as the first step toward a stable future. as a center of support, we connect our neighbors to essential community resources and provide direct services to address the root causes of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Philadelphia Legal Assistance Center Inc C/O the Organization

Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.

Crime & Legal
11
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
12
Pathways Pa Inc

To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosie's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Americas Unite. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NETWORK FOR GOOD - RALLYCAP SPORTS: $22,510 · OtherNETWORK FOR GOOD - RALLYCAP SPORTSAchieve Academy: $6,180 · OtherAchieve AcademyJERSEY CARES INC: $5,000 · OtherJERSEY CARES INCSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC: $4,120 · OtherSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INCFamily Resource Associates Inc: $4,000 · OtherFamily Resource Associates IncSMILE TRAIN INC: $4,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCALLAIR: $4,000 · OtherALLAIRPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT: $4,010 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECTNEW CITY KIDS INC: $2,060 · Other+3 more: $5,030 · Other+3 moreTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $29,378 · PhilanthropyTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FU…BACKPACKS FOR LIFE INC: $2,127 · PhilanthropyBACKPACKS FOR LIFE INCMARIAN HOUSE INC: $19,326 · Human ServicesMARIAN HOUSE INCAMERICAS UNITE: $4,083 · Human ServicesAMERICAS UNITEONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNO LIMITS CAFE: $10,000 · EmploymentGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalLUNCH BREAK INC: $6,231 · Food & NutritionALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $4,177 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLACE INC: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$60,910Philanthropy$31,505Human Services$24,409Employment$10,000International$10,000Food & Nutrition$6,231Housing & Shelter$6,177

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $29,378 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARIAN HOUSE INC: $19,326 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNO LIMITS CAFE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $6,231 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJERSEY CARES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $4,177 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC: $4,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HEALTH LAW PROJECT: $4,010 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFamily Resource Associates Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKPACKS FOR LIFE INC: $2,127 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $2,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNCOMMONORG INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Redhead Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Redhead Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Family Resource Associates Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Jersey Cares Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Marian House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Redhead’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home