Skip to content
The Redeemed Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

The Redeemed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$110kPhilanthropy$55kHealth$35kHuman Services$20kReligion$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL$20,000
PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC$5,000
EAGLE MOUNT - BOZEMAN$5,000
GRACE BIBLE CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $10k → 13%PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $10k → 10%PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 4 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$180k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $95k · revenue +134%
  • EM
    Eagle Mount
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +147%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN CO dba ZOECARE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • ZI
    ZoeCare Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • PH
    PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
2
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health
3
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
4
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
5
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
6
Hope for Life Pregnancy Care Center

The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies

Health
7
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

—
8
Pregnancy Resource Center of Stanly County Inc

The organization is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life. the prc has pregnancy & ultrasound testing along with christian counseling on parenting skills and abstinence.

—
9
Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc

Offer pregnancy test, abstinence programs , post-abortion bible studies, assistance with material need, first trimester ultrasounds, mens mentoring program, parenting classes.services are free and confidential with focus in wayne co oh…

Health
10
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
11
The Pregnancy Center

The Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered ministry providing alternatives to abortion, and support programs committed to saving lives physically, spiritually, and emotionally, one life at a time for the glory of God.

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Faith Based Pregnancy Services

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ZoeCare Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $95,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO: $5,000 · ReligionEagle Mount: $55,000 · PhilanthropyEagle MountRAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL: $20,000 · HealthRAMSEY KELLER …ZoeCare Inc: $10,000 · HealthZoeCare IncPREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN CO dba ZOECARE: $15,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CA…PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY HE…PROVISION INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · InternationalGRACE BIBLE CHURCH: $5,000 · Other
Religion$100,000Philanthropy$55,000Health$30,000Human Services$25,000International$15,000Other$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEagle Mount: $55,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL: $20,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN CO dba ZOECARE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROVISION INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetZoeCare Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Redeemed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Redeemed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Redeemed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home