Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Redeemed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$110kPhilanthropy$55kHealth$35kHuman Services$20kReligion$10k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL$20,000
PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC$5,000
GRACE BIBLE CHURCH$5,000
EAGLE MOUNT - BOZEMAN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $10k → 13%PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $10k → 10%PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$180k · 4 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$180k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $95k · revenue +134%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN CO dba ZOECARE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +7%
  • PI
    PROVISION INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • ZI
    ZoeCare Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • PH
    PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
2
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health
3
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
4
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
5
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
6
Hope for Life Pregnancy Care Center

The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies

Health
7
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

8
Pregnancy Resource Center of Stanly County Inc

The organization is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life. the prc has pregnancy & ultrasound testing along with christian counseling on parenting skills and abstinence.

9
Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc

Offer pregnancy test, abstinence programs , post-abortion bible studies, assistance with material need, first trimester ultrasounds, mens mentoring program, parenting classes.services are free and confidential with focus in wayne co oh…

Health
10
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
11
The Pregnancy Center

The Pregnancy Center is a Christ-centered ministry providing alternatives to abortion, and support programs committed to saving lives physically, spiritually, and emotionally, one life at a time for the glory of God.

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Faith Based Pregnancy Services

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is ZoeCare Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $95,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO — $5,000 · ReligionEagle Mount — $55,000 · PhilanthropyEagle MountRAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL — $20,000 · HealthRAMSEY KELLER …ZoeCare Inc — $10,000 · HealthZoeCare IncPREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN CO dba ZOECARE — $15,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CA…PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY HE…PROVISION INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 · InternationalGRACE BIBLE CHURCH — $5,000 · Other
Religion$100,000Philanthropy$55,000Health$30,000Human Services$25,000International$15,000Other$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEagle Mount — $55,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL — $20,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARING CENTER OF GALLATIN CO dba ZOECARE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROVISION INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetZoeCare Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Redeemed Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph