Skip to content
The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$141M
Granted FY2024still arriving
413
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$230MCommunity Improvement$102MRecreation & Sports$96MEnvironment$75MEducation$49MHuman Services$27MArts & Culture$23MYouth Development$19MOther$0
02FY2024 · 413 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k97 grants · $141k
  • $10k–50k61 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k140 grants · $16M
  • $250k+115 grants · $124M
$100,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$897M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo$10,000,000
Southeast Michigan Foundation for Public Spaces$7,500,000
Detroit Riverfront Conservancy$6,532,800
Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo$5,000,000
Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan$5,000,000
BUDC$4,000,000
Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan$3,750,000
Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo$3,750,000
Buffalo Niagara Waterkeeper Inc$2,625,000
BUDC$2,500,000
The Boston Foundation Inc (dba The Philanthropic Initiative)$2,402,463
Ralph Wilson Park Conservancy$2,000,000
Greater Rochester Chamber Foundation (ROC2025 Fund)$2,000,000
BUDC$2,000,000
Invest Detroit Foundation$2,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $28.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Funders Together to End Homelessness: $200k → 10%Grantmakers in Aging: $482k → 9%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $2.5M → 22%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $159k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $158k → 9%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $1.5M → 22%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $150k → 7%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $1.1M → 22%State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs: $263k → 14%Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers: $500k → 22%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $500k → 22%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $380k → 22%STATE ALLIANCE OF MICHIGAN YMCAS: $229k → 14%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $250k → 22%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $160k → 22%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS: $234k → 8%EASTERSEALS MICHIGAN: $260k → 8%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $120k → 16%DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $150k → 21%DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $100k → 21%Detroit Police Athletic League Inc: $100k → 21%National Alliance for Caregiving: $300k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $747k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $731k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $708k → 21%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $680k → 21%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $4.3M → 13%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $1.8M → 13%YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $612k → 21%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $857k → 13%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $770k → 13%Lakeshore Connections Inc: $716k → 13%Lakeshore Connections Inc: $665k → 13%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $614k → 13%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $596k → 13%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $503k → 13%LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $233k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $188k → 13%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $136k → 13%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $500k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $250k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $250k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $250k → 21%THE BASBLUE FOUNDATION: $125k → 21%THE BASBLUE FOUNDATION: $125k → 21%Southeast Michigan Senior Regional Collaborative: $131k → 21%Detroit Area Agency on Aging: $365k → 21%DETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $205k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 38%.

The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$442M · 406 repeat orgs$41M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

406 repeat relationships: 193 still active in FY2024, 213 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

406
304

Total granted

$442M
$21M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $34M · revenue +51% · 67% of their budget
  • LC
    LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11M · revenue +151% · 88% of their budget
  • BUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9.4M · revenue +44% · 76% of their budget

Funded once

  • DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue +73%
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OLEAN NY AND BRADFORD PA
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue -13%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
2
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
3
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
4
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
5
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
6
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
9
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
10
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
11
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
12
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education; the most unlike its peers is Marine Safety Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

588 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 588 of the 809 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

74
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
110
Early backer (in before they grew)
584/588
Grantees still filing
370/588
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC: $107,614,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFF…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $76,235,081 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MI…SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC SPACES: $7,700,000 · Philanthropy+15 more: $24,201,139 · Philanthropy+15 moreBUDC: $70,479,050 · OtherBUDCNATURAL HERITAGE TRUST: $20,543,266 · OtherNATURAL HERITAGE TRUSTThe Boston Foundation Inc (dba The Philanthropic Initiative): $10,146,959 · Other+98 more: $142,804,460 · Other+98 moreINVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION: $14,000,000 · Community ImprovementINVEST DETR…WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT: $11,503,080 · Community ImprovementWAYNE STATE…DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSOCIATION: $7,441,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT ECO…PEDALS MICHIGAN: $4,951,470 · Community ImprovementPEDALS MICH…THE CENTER FOR REGIONAL STRATEGIES INC: $4,525,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CENTER …DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $3,615,000 · Community ImprovementDETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · Community Improvement43NORTH BPC INC: $2,840,000 · Community Improvement+17 more: $16,442,074 · Community Improvement+17 moreDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $33,809,600 · Recreation & SportsRALPH WILSON PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $3,001,600 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $1,461,300 · Recreation & Sports+7 more: $4,302,970 · Recreation & SportsSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC: $5,056,180 · EducationHENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,750,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $2,390,000 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · EducationMACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,786,200 · EducationLAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $1,750,000 · EducationSOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $1,454,805 · EducationBUFFALO STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,450,200 · EducationMichigan Afterschool Partnership: $1,363,590 · EducationNew York State Network for Youth Success: $1,052,305 · EducationJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,027,000 · Education+15 more: $8,554,026 · EducationLAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $11,034,377 · Human ServicesROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $7,018,020 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $3,753,995 · Human ServicesGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $1,063,982 · Human Services+8 more: $3,874,100 · Human ServicesBUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC: $9,420,000 · EnvironmentHURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE: $3,900,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE DETROIT RIVER: $2,614,900 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE ROUGE: $2,388,790 · EnvironmentOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE LAND TRUST INC: $1,500,000 · EnvironmentBUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY BOTANICAL GARDENS SOCIETY INC: $1,000,000 · EnvironmentNIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE ARE: $750,000 · Environment+1 more: $697,130 · Environment
Philanthropy$215,750,470Other$243,973,735Community Improvement$68,317,624Recreation & Sports$42,575,470Education$30,634,306Human Services$26,744,474Environment$22,270,820

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC: $107,614,250 over 5y, 45% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $76,235,081 over 5y, 16% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $33,809,600 over 5y, 67% of budgetNATURAL HERITAGE TRUST: $20,543,266 over 5y, 49% of budgetINVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION: $14,000,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT: $11,503,080 over 5y, 54% of budgetLAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC: $11,034,377 over 5y, 88% of budgetBUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC: $9,420,000 over 5y, 76% of budgetSOUTHEAST MICHIGAN FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC SPACES: $7,700,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetDETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSOCIATION: $7,441,000 over 4y, 45% of budgetROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $7,018,020 over 5y, 82% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS: $5,629,583 over 5y, 24% of budgetSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC: $5,056,180 over 4y, 17% of budgetBUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY: $5,033,050 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetMARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM: $5,002,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC: $5,001,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetPEDALS MICHIGAN: $4,951,470 over 3y, 100% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $4,631,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REGIONAL STRATEGIES INC: $4,525,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetMONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,443,000 over 4y, 37% of budgetHURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE: $3,900,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,829,600 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $3,753,995 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetDETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $3,615,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR COUNTY: $3,296,350 over 5y, 11% of budgetMICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $3,237,000 over 4y, 75% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BUFFALO INC: $3,106,242 over 4y, 38% of budgetNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $3,050,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRALPH WILSON PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $3,001,600 over 3y, 43% of budgetDETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $2,974,825 over 4y, 0.2% of budget43NORTH BPC INC: $2,840,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetHENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,750,000 over 3y, 88% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DETROIT RIVER: $2,614,900 over 3y, 38% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $2,554,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION: $2,400,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $2,390,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ROUGE: $2,388,790 over 4y, 54% of budgetALFRED STATE COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $2,334,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $2,300,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC: $2,300,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetCausewave Community Partners Inc: $2,279,288 over 5y, 44% of budgetMichigan Physical Fitness Health and Sports Foundation: $2,278,800 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetBUFFALO OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY INC: $2,250,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $1,950,170 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMICHIGAN TRAILS & GREENWAYS ALLIANCE: $1,871,290 over 2y, 90% of budgetTHE WESTERN NEW YORK FOUNDATION: $1,845,175 over 2y, 54% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL HERITAGE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds INVEST DETROIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO NIAGARA WATERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC SPACES ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds SAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MARGARET WOODBURY STRONG MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MOTOWN HISTORICAL MUSUEM INC ↗
  • Who funds PEDALS MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REGIONAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HURON WATERLOO PATHWAYS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ST CLAIR COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEAGUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RALPH WILSON PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds 43NORTH BPC INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …DTE Energy FoundationCommunity Foundation …The Skillman Foundati…The John R Oishei Fou…Ford PhilanthropyUnited Way for Southe…The Kresge FoundationFirst Niagara Foundat…Hudson-Webber Foundat…McGregor FundThe Western New York …
Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY111.9× affinity109 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · DTE Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · The John R Oishei Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · First Niagara Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · McGregor Fund · The Western New York Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
70report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 809 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ralph C Wilson Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home