Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Quinn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
124
Grants FY2025still arriving
25
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$15MFood & Nutrition$3.4MEducation$1.8MEnvironment$767kCrime & Legal$594kPhilanthropy$436kArts & Culture$317kHuman Services$163kOther$0
02FY2025 · 124 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k77 grants · $243k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $631k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $543k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.8M
$5,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRAY DOG INSTITUTE$800,000
KANSAS PET ADVOCATES FOUNDATION$460,000
RINGO'S FUND$300,000
GREAT PLAINS SPCA$281,500
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$125,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$105,000
THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE$91,000
THRIVE PHILANTHROPY INC$59,875
KARUNA FOUNDATION$57,500
NATIONAL GREAT PYRENEES RESCUE INC$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ON A MISSION$40,000
FARM ACTION$40,000
HUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION$35,000
VEGAN HACKTIVISTS INC$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%THE HOPI FOUNDATION: $3k → 26%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $5k → 10%BIG CAT RESCUE: $5k → 13%THE HIVE: $10k → 22%THE HOPI FOUNDATION: $3k → 26%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $5k → 10%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%THE HOPI FOUNDATION: $3k → 26%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $5k → 10%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $5k → 10%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $5k → 10%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $25k → 10%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $3k → 10%SAFEHOME: $106k → 5%SAFEHOME: $6k → 5%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $5k → 10%SAFEHOME: $6k → 5%SAFEHOME: $6k → 5%SAFE HOME: $2k → 5%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $5k → 17%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $5k → 17%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $5k → 17%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 142 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

142 repeat relationships: 99 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

142
66

Total granted

$24M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+27%

Still filing today

77%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $501k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GREAT PLAINS SPCA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +6% · 39% of their budget
  • TG
    THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +432%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $933k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • KC
    KC CAMPUS FOR ANIMAL CARE
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • GC
    Game Changers Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue +269%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY CAMPUS FOR ANIMAL CARE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Institute for Animal Happiness

Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…

Animals
5
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
6
Global Food Partners Inc

Global food partners ("gfp") is an animal protection organization whose mission is to help food businesses meet their cage-free egg commitments and producers implement cage-free best practices.

Food & Nutrition
7
Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law and Policy Inc
Philanthropy
8
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
9
Food Animal Concerns Trust (Fact Inc)

Food animal concerns trust (fact) promotes the safe and humane production of meat, milk, and eggs. fact envisions that all food-producing animals be raised in a healthy and humane manner so that everyone will have access to safe and…

Animals
10
Humane Farm Animal Care

Every farmer and rancher participating in the Certified Humane program had to modify their operations to meet the Animal Care Standards and be certified. Schedule O

Animals
11
Center for a Humane Economy Inc

There are many pathways for improving the lives of animals, but encouraging corporations to embed animal protection values into their production practices, supply chains, marketing efforts and research and development activities may be the…

Animals
12
The Food Project Association

FarmSTAND uses legal advocacy and public education to address the environmental, labor, and animal welfare impacts of industrial agriculture and to support the viability of small family farmers.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stray Dog Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

173 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 173 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
170/173
Grantees still filing
110/173
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STRAY DOG INSTITUTE: $5,100,000 · AnimalsSTRAY DOG INSTITUTEGREAT PLAINS SPCA: $3,322,772 · AnimalsGREAT PLAINS SPCAKANSAS PET ADVOCATES FOUNDATION: $1,774,525 · AnimalsKANSAS PET ADVOCATES FOUNDATIONHumane World for Animals Inc: $932,500 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc+54 more: $3,311,088 · Animals+54 more50BY40 INC: $1,091,247 · Other50BY40 INCTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $712,589 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE …Great Plains SPCA: $611,666 · OtherGreat Plains SPCAHARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $545,635 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOLCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY STUDIES: $291,667 · OtherLEWIS & CLARK LAW SCHOOL: $210,000 · Other+83 more: $2,661,250 · Other+83 moreTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $2,091,000 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD…A Well-Fed World: $247,500 · Food & NutritionA Well-Fed Wo…Game Changers Foundation Inc: $200,000 · Food & NutritionGame Changers…New Roots Institute: $115,000 · Food & Nutrition+16 more: $397,500 · Food & Nutrition+16 moreNew York University: $500,000 · EducationFARM ACTION: $285,000 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $100,000 · EducationVermont Law School: $55,000 · Education+6 more: $51,500 · EducationCDP NORTH AMERICA INC: $300,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC: $124,500 · EnvironmentHEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM: $70,000 · EnvironmentMULTIPLIER: $55,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute Inc: $50,000 · EnvironmentFOOD FOR CLIMATE LEAGUE: $30,000 · EnvironmentGREENFAITH INC: $27,500 · Environment+4 more: $54,943 · EnvironmentMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $470,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $139,000 · Crime & LegalSAFEHOME INC: $125,500 · Human ServicesTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesRethink Priorities: $27,500 · Human ServicesCompassion in World Farming Inc: $17,500 · Human ServicesTHE HIVE MENTALITY: $10,000 · Human Services+4 more: $23,000 · Human Services
Animals$14,440,885Other$6,124,054Food & Nutrition$3,051,000Education$1,106,500Environment$711,943Crime & Legal$609,000Human Services$233,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTRAY DOG INSTITUTE: $5,100,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetGREAT PLAINS SPCA: $3,322,772 over 7y, 39% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $2,091,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetKANSAS PET ADVOCATES FOUNDATION: $1,774,525 over 4y, 100% of budget50BY40 INC: $1,091,247 over 3y, 100% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $932,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNew York University: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $470,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetWAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $328,200 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCDP NORTH AMERICA INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetRINGO'S FUND: $300,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetNATIONAL GREAT PYRENEES RESCUE INC: $296,304 over 6y, 11% of budgetLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $287,500 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetFARM ACTION: $285,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetA Well-Fed World: $247,500 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $200,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetGame Changers Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $195,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $185,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $182,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWILDAID INC: $149,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY: $143,334 over 2y, 14% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $139,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $125,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC: $124,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFARM FORWARD INC: $117,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $115,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSENTIENT MEDIA: $111,250 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY CAMPUS FOR ANIMAL CARE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $97,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAUNALYTICS: $75,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetDOUBLE UP DRIVE INC: $74,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM: $70,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPLANT BASED FOODS INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY: $69,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC: $68,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC: $67,500 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP INC: $65,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVermont Law School: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY PIG RESCUE NETWORK INC: $40,500 over 5y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STRAY DOG INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS SPCA ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS PET ADVOCATES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 50BY40 INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds WAYSIDE WAIFS INC ↗
  • Who funds CDP NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds RINGO'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GREAT PYRENEES RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FARM ACTION ↗
  • Who funds A Well-Fed World ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC ↗
  • Who funds Game Changers Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds New Roots Institute ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENTIENT MEDIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Animal Charity EvaluatorsCA61.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Animal Charity Evaluators · Vegfund Inc · Humane America Animal Foundation · The Greenbaum Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · A Well-Fed World · Aceso Foundation Inc · Tipping Point Private Foundation · Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Karuna Foundation · Builders Vision Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Quinn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Quinn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Vermont Law School: 14% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Quinn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Quinn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 239 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quinn’s filings →

More from the funding graph