Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Puskar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$118kFood & Nutrition$92kHousing & Shelter$78kCommunity Improvement$74kEducation$67kInternational$42kHuman Services$40kPhilanthropy$6k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
$11,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINSHIP MKE INC (AKA KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$16,000
GIVE WELL$16,000
PATH HOME$12,000
DAYTON FOOD BANK$11,000
OPEN ARMS HEALTH CLINIC$11,000
RURAL ACTION$11,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CONVERGENCE RESOURCE CENTER$5,000
GINA RIMER ALS FOUNDATION$5,000
PORTLAND FOOD BANK$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
OR
OH
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$416k · 10 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$416k
$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+26%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PATH HOME
    5× · 2020–2025 · $74k · revenue +88%
  • KINSHIP MKE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $69k · revenue +366%
  • M
    MIRACLEFEET
    2× · 2021–2023 · $40k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • HT
    HANNAH'S TREASURE CHESTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +35%
  • FONDY FOOD CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue +73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
3
Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
6
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
7
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
8
Advance Access and Delivery Inc

To work in solidarity with partners around the world to overcome barriers to high quality health care and medicines, particularly for economically and socially marginalized groups. this means supporting coalitions around the world doing…

International
9
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
10
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
11
Thrive Networks Global

Thrive Networks' expertise is built on over 30 years of experience of designing, testing, and implementing cutting-edge, evidence-based programs in water supply, sanitation and hygiene WASH, economic empowerment, gender equity, healthy…

International
12
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Givedirectly Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fondy Food Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONVERGENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $79,000 · OtherCONVERGENCE RESOURCE CENTERLIBRARY FOR AFRICA: $46,000 · OtherLIBRARY FOR AFRICAALS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATIONKINSHIP MKE INC (AKA KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $16,000 · OtherKINSHIP MKE INC (AKA KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTERTORNADO SURVIVORS PATHWAY TO HOME OWNERSHIP: $16,000 · OtherTORNADO SURVIVORS PATHWAY TO HOME OWNERSHIPTHE WHITE FEATHER FOUNDATION (CYNTHIA LENNON SCHOLARSHIP FOR GIRLS): $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherDAYTON FOOD BANK: $11,000 · OtherFRONTLINE FAMILIES FUND: $10,000 · OtherUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $10,000 · OtherRURAL ACTION INC: $11,000 · Other+5 more: $27,000 · Other+5 moreKINSHIP MKE INC: $69,000 · Food & NutritionKINSHIP MKE INCFONDY FOOD CENTER INC: $13,000 · Food & NutritionFONDY FOOD CENT…MIRACLEFEET: $40,000 · HealthMIRACLEFEETI AM ALS: $30,000 · HealthI AM ALSOPEN ARMS HEALTH CLINIC INC: $11,000 · HealthOPEN ARMS HEAL…PATH HOME: $74,000 · Housing & ShelterPATH HOMENOVA UKRAINE: $42,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAI…REMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $13,000 · InternationalREMOTE ARE…HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $20,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CLEAR FUND: $16,000 · Philanthropy
Other$276,000Food & Nutrition$82,000Health$81,000Housing & Shelter$74,000International$55,000Human Services$30,000Philanthropy$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATH HOME: $74,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKINSHIP MKE INC: $69,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $42,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLEFEET: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetI AM ALS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFONDY FOOD CENTER INC: $13,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN ARMS HEALTH CLINIC INC: $11,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATH HOME ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP MKE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
  • Who funds I AM ALS ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds FONDY FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Puskar Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Puskar Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Puskar Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph