Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Priscilla Endicott Charitable Foundation #95-228210

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$340k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$254kReligion$222kFood & Nutrition$212kHealth$208kCivil Rights$180kAnimals$140kEnvironment$130kHousing & Shelter$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $123k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $218k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SRVASTI ABBEY CORP$45,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER PENINSULA$23,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$20,500
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$18,000
WOLF PACK SUPPORT SERVICES$17,500
WESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
MSPCA- ANGELL$14,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$12,500
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$12,000
MYRIAD BOTANNICAL GARDENS$10,000
FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST URBAN MINISTRY$8,500
WEEMA INTERNATIONAL$7,500
GAZA SOUP KITCHEN$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $2k → 8%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 8%LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $6k → 8%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 8%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 8%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $2k → 8%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 8%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 8%WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $1k → 8%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $9k → 8%WEEMA INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MI
NY
MA
IA
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 46 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
28

Total granted

$1.5M
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+17%

Still filing today

72%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +13%
  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $116k · revenue +58%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • HS
    HIGH STAR SUN EAGLE
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • CS
    CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +64%
  • AW
    ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
11
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wolf Pack Support Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/64
Grantees still filing
43/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SRAVASTI ABBEY CORP: $109,000 · OtherSRAVASTI ABBEY CORPNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $97,500 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKCATHEDRAL OF HOPE INC: $64,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF HOPE INCBENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES: $40,500 · OtherWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $38,500 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $38,000 · OtherWEEMA INTERNATIONAL INC: $39,000 · Other+52 more: $406,750 · Other+52 moreBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $115,500 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTE…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $113,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A…Wolf Pack Support Services: $69,500 · HealthWolf Pack Support Se…+2 more: $5,000 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $72,500 · AnimalsMASSACHUS…OPERATION KINDNESS: $52,500 · AnimalsOPERATION…ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $12,500 · AnimalsANIMAL WE…+2 more: $3,000 · AnimalsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $128,000 · Crime & LegalREMERGE INC: $4,500 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $2,000 · Crime & LegalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $94,000 · InternationalUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc: $10,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $4,000 · International+5 more: $5,500 · InternationalDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $49,000 · EnvironmentHARVARD CONSERVATION TRUST: $28,500 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $6,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: $5,000 · Environment+1 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentRebuilding Together Peninsula: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterMERYLS SAFE HAVEN INC: $7,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$833,750Health$303,500Animals$140,500Crime & Legal$134,500International$113,500Environment$102,000Housing & Shelter$87,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $128,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $115,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $113,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $97,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $94,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula: $80,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $72,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $52,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $49,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES: $40,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWEEMA INTERNATIONAL INC: $39,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $38,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD CONSERVATION TRUST: $28,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST STEPHEN'S YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $22,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP: $15,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF PALO ALTO - MID PENINSULA: $14,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Theatre of the Emerging American Moment Inc: $11,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERYLS SAFE HAVEN INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC: $7,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST KYINC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Madeira School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREMERGE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS HOUSE PRESCHOOL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW SOCKS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEDESIA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVICTOR WOOTEN'S CENTER FOR MUSIC AND NATURE: $2,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDandelion Arts Collective: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budget350ORG: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON BOOK PROGRAM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together Peninsula ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Wolf Pack Support Services ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT FRATERNITY OF UNITARIAN CHURCHES ↗
  • Who funds WEEMA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ST STEPHEN'S YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP ↗
  • Who funds CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF PALO ALTO - MID PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Theatre of the Emerging American Moment Inc ↗
  • Who funds Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MERYLS SAFE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WIDE HORIZONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds GAZA SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA19.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Chip Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Priscilla Endicott Charitable Foundation #95-228210 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Priscilla Endicott Charitable Foundation #95-228210. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Bagly Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp: 32% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Harvard Conservation Trust: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Priscilla Endicott Charitable Foundation #95-228210?

Find your warmest path to The Priscilla Endicott Charitable Foundation #95-228210 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Priscilla Endicott Charitable Foundation #95-228210’s filings →

More from the funding graph