Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Prime Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$107k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$356kEducation$176kPhilanthropy$92kHousing & Shelter$57kCrime & Legal$21kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$18kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC$54,983
BRIDGE OF PROMISE$25,000
THE OVERLAKE SCHOOL$15,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$5,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
BRIDGE MINISTRIES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $6k → 9%MARY'S PLANCE SEATTLE: $3k → 9%BRIDGE OF PROMISE: $25k → 9%BRIDGE OF PROMISE: $25k → 9%BRIDGE OF PROMISE: $8k → 9%BRIDGE OF PROMISE: $8k → 9%RYTHER: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $4k → 9%NORTHSHORE SENIOR CENTER: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
IA
IN
CA
CO
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$303k · 17 repeat orgs$477k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
79

Total granted

$303k
$400k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+37%

Still filing today

88%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +26%
  • BO
    BRIDGE OF PROMISE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +188%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $23k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2018 · $68k
  • SC
    Seattle Children's Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue +60%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
6
Seattle Economic Development Fund Business Impact Nw

To provide economic development financing to serve the needs of small businesses in the state of washington that would not qualify for private financing under conventional financing criteria.

Community Improvement
7
Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter

Arcs foundation advances science and technology in the united states by providing financial awards to academically outstanding u.s. citizens studying to complete degrees in science, engineering and medical research.

Education
8
Washington Bikes

Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.

Recreation & Sports
9
Spokane Regional Sports Commission

Economic and community development through sport tourism. bid to host and create major sporting events, and facility consultation and optimization.

—
10
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tabu Traveling Baseball Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/73
Grantees still filing
59/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $67,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $54,983 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $53,007 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERSeattle Children's Foundation: $50,500 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALVIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION: $38,250 · OtherVIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $25,000 · Other+66 more: $149,758 · Other+66 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $69,600 · HealthAmerican Hea…Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $6,000 · HealthFred Hutchin…Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute: $5,000 · HealthAddario Lung…+5 more: $9,740 · Health+5 moreBRIDGE OF PROMISE: $65,200 · Human ServicesBRIDGE OF P…MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $8,500 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLAC…HOPELINK: $3,500 · Human Services+3 more: $2,925 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationWASHINGTON…RAINIER SCHOLARS: $17,750 · EducationRAINIER SC…THE OVERLAKE SCHOOL: $15,000 · EducationTHE OVERLA…CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA…ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF WASHINGTON: $3,000 · EducationEDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationBELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,490 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $23,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $500 · Housing & ShelterEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 · Civil RightsThe Pride Foundation: $2,000 · Civil RightsSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $1,750 · PhilanthropyJohnson Family Stewardship Foundation: $1,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$488,998Health$90,340Human Services$80,125Education$73,740Housing & Shelter$23,500Civil Rights$22,000Philanthropy$13,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $69,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OF PROMISE: $65,200 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $53,007 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $50,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $17,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OVERLAKE SCHOOL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPRENTICESHIP AND NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE WASHINGTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAddario Lung Cancer Medical Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICO CM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE BELLEVUE POLICE FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNORTHWEST CENTER: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION CITY COMMUNITY FUND: $4,201 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHOPELINK: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF WASHINGTON: $3,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSEATTLE ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEDMONDS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBridge Ministries Bridge Disability Ministries: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,490 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pride Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAP Health Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBERT HOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBILLY DEFRANK LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,940 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $1,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSQUEST CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $1,680 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJohnson Family Stewardship Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRYTHER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUMC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA40.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Raikes Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Prime Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Prime Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Prime Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Prime Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prime’s filings →

More from the funding graph