Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Plesser Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Science & Tech$85kAnimals$77kInternational$65kHealth$49kReligion$40kPhilanthropy$19kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$828k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEITZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$15,000
ST JUDE$6,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$6,000
ASPCA$4,800
WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$4,200
CHARITY GOLF TODAY$4,200
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$3,000
US FUND FOR UNICEF$3,000
HOPE FOR WARRIORS$3,000
HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
GIVE WELL$1,200
PECONIC TRUST$1,200
FOOD BANK NYC$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DISABILITY FUND: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$365k · 28 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
6

Total granted

$365k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+57%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalAnimalsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +135%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +39%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • BF
    BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • AH
    AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +136%
  • BH
    BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
11
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Repair the World; the most unlike its peers is American Humane Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $84,500 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTIT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $37,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,150 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalST JUDE: $37,500 · OtherST JUDEWORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $24,500 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATIONALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $19,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $13,550 · OtherAMERICAN HUMANE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $7,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+15 more: $32,268 · Other+15 moreTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $31,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERIC…AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $4,200 · AnimalsAMERICAN H…+1 more: $500 · AnimalsAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $12,250 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $9,500 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthHOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $700 · HealthHope For The Warriors: $18,750 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND: $4,600 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $8,200 · Community ImprovementREPAIR THE WORLD: $3,200 · Community ImprovementPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $4,400 · Environment
International$144,650Other$134,718Animals$35,700Health$30,450Philanthropy$23,350Community Improvement$11,400Environment$4,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $84,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors: $18,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $12,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $8,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $4,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD: $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $3,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION RESTORE SIGHT INC: $700 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTHE DISABILITY FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds REPAIR THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION RESTORE SIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DISABILITY FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Plesser Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Plesser Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Plesser’s filings →

    More from the funding graph