Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pj Moran Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.0MEducation$627kScience & Tech$50kFood & Nutrition$30kReligion$29kInternational$25kHuman Services$20kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS$55,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON$20,000
STRAKE JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY$10,000
INTERFAITH MINISTRIES FOR GREATER$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
IL
IN
VA
MD
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The Pj Moran Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 92%.

The Pj Moran Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 17 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -1435% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$1.7M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-1435%

Still filing today

71%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalPublic BenefitArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    5× · 2020–2024 · $279k · revenue +69%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +36%
  • WA
    World Affairs Council of Greater Houston
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • NI
    NANOVIC INSTITUTE - NOTRE DAME
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $23k
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
8
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
9
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
10
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
11
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
12
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of St Thomas; the most unlike its peers is Lone Star Flight Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

M D ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $1,010,000 · OtherM D ANDERSON CANCER CENTERStrake Jesuit College Prep: $120,000 · OtherStrake Jesuit College Prep+23 more: $214,789 · Other+23 moreUniversity of St Thomas: $278,575 · EducationUniversity of St ThomasGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI …FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGEUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationWorld Affairs Council of Greater Houston: $25,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $20,000 · Human ServicesDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $9,000 · Public BenefitLone Star Flight Museum: $3,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,344,789Education$423,575International$25,000Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Public Benefit$9,000Arts & Culture$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $278,575 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Affairs Council of Greater Houston: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIARWOOD SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRATTVILLE CHRISTIAN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLone Star Flight Museum: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAY AREA CHORUS: $2,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds World Affairs Council of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIARWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PRATTVILLE CHRISTIAN ↗
  • Who funds DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ↗
  • Who funds Lone Star Flight Museum ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY AREA CHORUS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Strake Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation · Charity Guild of Catholic Women of Harris County Inc · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pj Moran Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pj Moran Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida Southern College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pj Moran’s filings →

More from the funding graph