Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation

The sole activity of the charity is the making of charitable contributions to organizations that have been recognized by the internal revenue service as tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code (the "code"), but are not "private foundations" within the meaning of section 509(a) of the code. It is expected that many…

$716k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Itemized grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$650k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$170,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 15
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$496k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$650k18%
FY20247$273k0%
FY20239$386k11%
FY202215$659k27%
FY202115$388k53%
FY20208$312kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$1.3MEducation$575kCivil Rights$245kFood & Nutrition$215kCommunity Improvement$125kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$50kSocial Science$50kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
CA
VA
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 23 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEqual Justice Works: $800,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThrive Scholars: $395,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Justice and Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco: $256,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area: $195,440 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $170,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation of the Bar of the City of New York Fund Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMid-Atlantic Innocence Project: $95,295 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBlack Girl Ventures Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCalifornia Western School of Law: $70,630 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCity Harvest Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Food Bank: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHands on Nashville Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Midnight Mission: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWashington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCapital Area Food Bank Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBread for the City Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEqual Justice Initiative: $14,972 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morrison & Foerster FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · Venable Foundation Inc · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Mc Dermott Will and Emery Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation

How much does The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation give?
The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation reported 11 itemized grants totaling $649,600, out of $715,850 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 15 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (49%), Education (21%), Civil Rights (9%).
Who are The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Equal Justice Works ($800k), Thrive Scholars ($395k), The Justice and Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco ($257k).
Does The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Morrison & Foerster Foundation, Venable Foundation Inc, The Sidley Austin Foundation.
Where is The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation based?
The Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Foundation is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman’s filings →

More from the funding graph