· Private foundation
Pd Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k30 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $195k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES | $30,000 |
| PENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST | $25,000 |
| THE BRANDON AREA FOOD SHELF | $20,000 |
| FOOD PANTRY OF IRC | $15,000 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS FAMILY ACADEMY | $15,000 |
| SAFESPACE | $10,000 |
| LITTLE BIRTHDAY ANGELS | $10,000 |
| OCTAVIAN VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| HIBISCIS CHILDREN'S CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 |
| THE LEARNING ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC4× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +13%
- PEPENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST6× · 2018–2025 · $140k · revenue +68%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC8× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- KCKAUAI COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue -96%
- TCTHE COLLEGE SETTLEMENT OF PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +1%
- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safespace Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
- Who funds PENNYPACK ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS FAMILY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK RIVER GOOD NEIGHBOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds KAUAI COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BRANDON FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Black River Independent School Committee ↗
- Who funds UPPER DUBLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP THORPE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Brandon Area Rescue Squad Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE SETTLEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Special Operations Fund ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY MUTTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SAFESPACE INC ↗
- Who funds MATTIE N DIXON COMMUNITY CUPBOARD INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE BIRTHDAY ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Sad Foundation Inc · The Cigna Group Foundation · The Foster Family Foundation · Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc · Grand Harbor Community Outreach Program Inc · The John's Island Foundation Inc · Ethel Kennedy Foundation · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pd Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- FosterClub Inc — 21% of income from government
- Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc — 15% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Brandon Free Public Library — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.