Skip to content
The Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities Foundation Inc

CCF Supports at-risk youth in Washington DC Metro Region through fundraising efforts and direct programming: CCF-Coats for Kids Program, CCF Cares, Summer Camp Grants and Grants to non-profit organizations serving at-risk youth.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$194kEducation$165kHealth$87kFood & Nutrition$53kYouth Development$41kCommunity Improvement$20kReligion$17kRecreation & Sports$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $38,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $58,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GR$10,000
DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND$10,000
SO WHAT ELSE$10,000
LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CAMPAGNA CENTER: $10k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GR: $20k → 8%ST ANNES CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%CAMPAGNA CENTER: $10k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GR: $15k → 8%ST ANNES CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 11%CAMPAGNA CENTER: $6k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GR: $10k → 8%ST ANNES CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 11%DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND: $13k → 14%HEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTHS: $12k → 8%DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND: $13k → 14%DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND: $11k → 14%HEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTHS: $10k → 8%DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND: $10k → 14%HEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTHS: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$500k · 17 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$500k
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-17%

Still filing today

88%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BJ
    BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON
    3× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +11%
  • CE
    CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $41k · revenue +26%
  • PP
    PHILLIPS PROGRAMS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $36k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -29%
  • HA
    HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -17%
  • CO
    CONVENTION OF P E CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
2
Wonders Early Learning Extended Day

To create and advance high quality, diverse educational communities that teach children the foundations of life-long learning and social responsibility.

—
3
Global Kids Inc

Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.

Youth Development
4
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
5
The Mclean School of Maryland Inc

Mclean school's small classes and abilities model prepare bright students in kindergarten through twelfth grade, including those with dyslexia, anxiety, and attention issues, for college success.

Education
6
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
7
Learn Dc Public Charter School

Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.

Education
8
Horizons Greater Washington Inc

Horizons greater washington is a tuition-free academic and enrichment program serving public and charter school students in families from underserved communities in washington, dc and maryland. their mission is to advance educational…

Youth Development
9
Educare Dc

Educare dc's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap for young children living in poverty and give them the skills necessary for success in kindergarten and beyond. we work at the intersection of practice, policy, and research to…

Human Services
10
Browne Academy

The Academy is a pre-kindergarten through grade eight independent school preparing girls and boys in the metropolitan Washington, DC area for competitive secondary schools. The Academy is a diverse independent day school committed to…

—
11
Junior Achievement of Greater Washington

To educate and inspire young people to succeed in a global economy.

International
12
Green Hedges School Inc

Green Hedges inspires young people of talent and promise to develop clear values, a desire for wisdom, and an appreciation for all endeavors which broaden the mind and enlighten the spirit.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Greater Washington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bender Jcc of Greater Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DC CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND: $46,500 · Human ServicesDC CHILDREN'S TRUST FUNDBENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $45,000 · Human ServicesBENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTONHEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTH INC: $32,400 · Human ServicesHEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTH INCSt Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: $27,500 · Human ServicesSt Anns Center for Children Yout…THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INCTHE HOUSE INC: $32,000 · OtherTHE HOUSE INCPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $23,000 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN…WASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMY: $17,000 · OtherWASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMYHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $15,000 · OtherHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INCCONVENTION OF P E CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $13,000 · OtherCONVENTION OF P E CHURCH OF TH…PROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC: $6,500 · OtherEncore Stage and Studio Inc: $24,500 · OtherEncore Stage and Studio IncA GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $20,000 · OtherA GREATER WASHINGTON INCMETROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $7,000 · OtherSTRIVE HOW YOU LEAD MATTERS INC: $7,000 · OtherHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $46,000 · HealthHOPE FOR HENRY F…CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER: $41,000 · HealthCLOVERLEAF EQUIN…PHILLIPS PROGRAMS: $36,000 · EducationPHILLIPS P…WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON…Student-Athletes Organized to Under: $7,000 · EducationStudent-At…GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationGEORGE MAS…SO WHAT ELSE INC: $23,500 · PhilanthropyKIDS IN NEED DISTRIBUTORS INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JOHN THOMPSON III FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$177,400Other$165,000Health$87,000Education$59,000Philanthropy$48,500Youth Development$44,500Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDC CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND: $46,500 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER: $41,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPHILLIPS PROGRAMS: $36,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTH INC: $32,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOUSE INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEncore Stage and Studio Inc: $24,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSO WHAT ELSE INC: $23,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetA GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $20,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetKIDS IN NEED DISTRIBUTORS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $14,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHN THOMPSON III FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIVE HOW YOU LEAD MATTERS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Co…Clark-Winchcole Found…United Way of the Nat…Dimick Foundation Joh…The Morris and Gwendo…The Community Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: 6% of income from government
  • Bender Jcc of Greater Washington: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home