· Public charity
The Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities Foundation Inc
CCF Supports at-risk youth in Washington DC Metro Region through fundraising efforts and direct programming: CCF-Coats for Kids Program, CCF Cares, Summer Camp Grants and Grants to non-profit organizations serving at-risk youth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $38,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $58,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DC CHILDRENS TRUST FUND | $10,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GR | $10,000 |
| SO WHAT ELSE | $10,000 |
| LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BJBENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON3× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +11%
- CECLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER3× · 2017–2019 · $41k · revenue +26%
- PPPHILLIPS PROGRAMS3× · 2017–2019 · $36k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CACAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INCone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -29%
- HAHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INCone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -17%
- COCONVENTION OF P E CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2017 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create and advance high quality, diverse educational communities that teach children the foundations of life-long learning and social responsibility.
Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…
Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.
Mclean school's small classes and abilities model prepare bright students in kindergarten through twelfth grade, including those with dyslexia, anxiety, and attention issues, for college success.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens
Horizons greater washington is a tuition-free academic and enrichment program serving public and charter school students in families from underserved communities in washington, dc and maryland. their mission is to advance educational…
Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.
Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.
To educate and inspire young people to succeed in a global economy.
Green Hedges inspires young people of talent and promise to develop clear values, a desire for wisdom, and an appreciation for all endeavors which broaden the mind and enlighten the spirit.
Educare dc's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap for young children living in poverty and give them the skills necessary for success in kindergarten and beyond. we work at the intersection of practice, policy, and research to…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Higher Achievement Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bender Jcc of Greater Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DC CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds HEARTS AND HOMES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Encore Stage and Studio Inc ↗
- Who funds SO WHAT ELSE INC ↗
- Who funds A GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN NEED DISTRIBUTORS INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN THOMPSON III FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRIVE HOW YOU LEAD MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Student-Athletes Organized to Under ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Peter B Teeley Childrens Charities Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families — 6% of income from government
- Bender Jcc of Greater Washington — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.