Skip to content
The Peck Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Peck Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Peck Family Foundation Inc’s FY2026 grant dollars went to The Dallas Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Peck Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $14k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
5
’18
4
’19
2
’20
4
’21
2
’22
7
’23
7
’24
4
’25
0
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$63kHuman Services$47kHealth$25kReligion$13kEnvironment$10kArts & Culture$5kCrime & Legal$2kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$86k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CLEARITY FOUNDATION$10,000
NANTIONAL FAMILY RESILIENCY CENTER$1,000
TALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER$700
MID SHORE COUNCIL ON FAMILIY VIOLENCE$500
FOR ALL SEASONS$500
OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH ALLIANCE$500
CHANNEL MARKER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
KY
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 13 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$86k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+26%

Still filing today

77%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NATIONAL FAMILY RESILIENCY CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +27%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +51%
  • NA
    National Association For Children Of Alcoholics
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • UF
    UMCES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
2
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
3
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
4
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
5
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
7
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
10
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Toledo Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chesapeake Film Festival Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL FAMILY RESILANCY CENTER INC: $40,409 · OtherNATIONAL FAMILY RESILANCY CENTER INCUMCES FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherUMCES FOUNDATIONNATIONAL FAMILY RESILIENCY CENTER INC: $6,500 · OtherNATIONAL FAMILY RESILIENCY CENTER INCNational Association For Children Of Alcoholics: $5,500 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THIRD HAVEN MEETING: $5,000 · OtherTHIRD HAVEN MEETING HOUSE: $5,000 · Other+11 more: $11,500 · Other+11 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS …TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PH…+2 more: $1,000 · EducationThe Clearity Foundation: $15,000 · HealthThe Cleari…CHANNEL MARKER INC: $1,500 · HealthCHANNEL MA…CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE FILM FESTIVAL INC: $2,200 · Arts & CultureTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC: $1,900 · Housing & ShelterTALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOASTAL HOSPICE: $500 · Human Services
Other$113,909Education$22,000Health$16,500Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$2,200Philanthropy$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,900Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Clearity Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FAMILY RESILIENCY CENTER INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Association For Children Of Alcoholics: $5,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE FILM FESTIVAL INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMID-SHORE COUNCIL ON FAMILY VIOLENCE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC: $1,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHANNEL MARKER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR ALL SEASONS INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL HOSPICE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALBOT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid Shore Community F…Van Strum Foundation …T & M Mitchell Fdn Di…The Llandaff Family T…The Michael and Nancy…Ruth and Robert St Jo…Watson Stone Family F…Richard J and Ellen G…Grayce B Kerr Fund IncThe Seip Family Found…Baird Foundation IncVanguard Charitable E…
Mid Shore Community Foundation IncMD19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · Van Strum Foundation 8833023 · T & M Mitchell Fdn Dima-Blrk · The Llandaff Family Trust · The Michael and Nancy Klein Foundation Inc · Ruth and Robert St John Foundation Inc · Watson Stone Family Foundation Inc · Richard J and Ellen G Bodorff Charitable Foundation Inc · Grayce B Kerr Fund Inc · The Seip Family Foundation Limited Eevercore Trust CO C/O Ashley Ferriello · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peck Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peck Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Mid-Shore Council On Family Violence: 26% of income from government
  • For All Seasons Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peck Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home