Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Pearson Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2020
10
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$2k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of The Pearson Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Pearson Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $6k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
17
7
18
6
19
6
20
4
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Philanthropy$170kReligion$20kHealth$7kInternational$4kAnimals$3kPublic Benefit$500Education$200Arts & Culture$200Other$0
02FY2020 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$400
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL$1,500
THE TEMPLE$1,500
EVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL$1,500
ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE$750
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$400
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL KADDISH LWP$200
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$200
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL COM TZEDAKAH$200
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$100
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $166k → 10%STANDWITHUS: $1k → 14%THE NY COMMUNITY TRUST: $200 → 17%ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $500 → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $100 → 13%HEARTLAND EQUINE RESCUE: $1k → 8%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $2k → 15%ELMHURST CHILDREN'S ASST FOUNDATION: $200 → 7%TOYS FOR TOTS: $200 → 7%RIGHT TO LIFE: $50 → 9%THE TEMPLE: $2k → 15%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $922 → 10%ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $750 → 14%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $400 → 17%ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $300 → 17%HEARTLAND EQUINE RESCUE: $500 → 8%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $2k → 15%THE TEMPLE: $2k → 15%ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $750 → 14%ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $100 → 17%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $2k → 15%THE TEMPLE: $2k → 15%ISREAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $500 → 14%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $2k → 15%THE TEMPLE: $2k → 15%ISREAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $500 → 14%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $2k → 15%THE TEMPLE: $2k → 15%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL KADDISH LWP: $200 → 15%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL COM TZEDAKAH: $200 → 15%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $100 → 15%TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $50 → 15%WNIN: $200 → 15%FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE - EVANSVI: $50 → 15%VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27k · 8 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$27k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+56%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
InternationalHealthAnimalsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k
  • TT
    THE TEMPLE CONGREGATION ADATH ISREAL B RITH SHOLOM INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k
  • EJ
    EVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL
    3× · 2019–2021 · $5k · revenue -38%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • VC
    VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

3
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

4
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
9
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Heartland Equine Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $167,257 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more — $200 · PhilanthropyTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL — $7,550 · OtherTEMPLE B'NAI ISR…THE TEMPLE CONGREGATION ADATH ISREAL B RITH SHOLOM INC — $7,500 · OtherTHE TEMPLE CONGR…ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO — $5,000 · OtherST MARY'S MEDICA…EVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL — $4,500 · OtherEVANSVILLE JEWIS…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL — $1,500 · Other+10 more — $2,900 · Other+10 moreISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $3,500 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $200 · InternationalHeartland Equine Rescue Inc — $1,500 · AnimalsVANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $900 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $200 · HealthHONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC — $500 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$167,457Other$28,950International$3,700Animals$2,500Health$1,100Public Benefit$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL — $4,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWNIN TRI-STATE PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Heartland Equine Rescue Inc
  • Who funds VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC
  • Who funds WNIN TRI-STATE PUBLIC MEDIA INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Pearson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Pearson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Pearson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph