Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Peace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$12kArts & Culture$8kEmployment$7kCivil Rights$5kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$4kCrime & Legal$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$197k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED HOOK INITIATIVE$3,500
PCRF$3,500
CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) BOSTON$2,500
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 8%THE BEYOND BOND & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $3k → 10%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $4k → 20%SISTER SONG THE NATIONAL WOMEN OF COLOR: $5k → 13%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $3k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $3k → 20%SOLUTIONS AT WORK INC: $3k → 8%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $3k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33k · 5 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$33k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+29%

Still filing today

60%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RED HOOK INITIATIVE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +13%
  • P
    PCRF
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k
  • PD
    PATRICK DALY SCHOOL OF ARTS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k

Funded once

  • SI
    SISTERSONG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -8%
  • BB
    BEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brookview House Inc

Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
2
Digital Ready Inc

Digital Ready activates the creative potential of young adults, especially low-income residents, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in Boston's innovation economy.

Education
3
Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association Inc

The mission of the volunteer lawyers project of the boston bar association is to increase access to justice by delivering high quality pro bono civil legal services to eligible clients in the greater boston area.

Crime & Legal
4
Connections Work

Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.

—
5
Community Counseling of Bristol County Inc

The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…

Health
6
Boston After School & Beyond Inc

Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…

Education
7
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
8
Co-Counsel Nyc Inc

To transform our collective capacity to navigate complex legal systems and support safe, thriving, and engaged immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
9
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
10
Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education
11
Community Art Center Inc

To cultivate an engaged community of youth whose powerful artistic voices transform their lives, their neighborhoods and their worlds.

Human Services
12
Brookline Community Mental Health Center Inc Dba the Brookline Center

The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cambridge Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Red Hook Art Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $12,250 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIVESISTERSONG INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INCCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INCBEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSE: $2,500 · Human ServicesBEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSESOLUTIONS AT WORK INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS AT WORK INCPCRF: $8,500 · OtherPCRFPATRICK DALY SCHOOL OF ARTS: $5,000 · OtherPATRICK DALY SCHOOL OF ARTSGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) BOSTON: $2,500 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) BOSTONJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS): $2,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS)CREATIVE ARTS AT PARK: $1,500 · OtherCREATIVE ARTS AT PARKFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $2,500 · EmploymentRED HOOK ART PROJECT INC: $1,250 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$26,250Other$24,000Employment$2,500Arts & Culture$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $12,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERSONG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSE: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRED HOOK ART PROJECT INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cambridge Community FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cambridge Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Solutions at Work Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Cambridge Community Center Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Peace Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Peace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peace’s filings →

More from the funding graph