Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Peace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Youth Development$12kArts & Culture$8kEmployment$7kCivil Rights$5kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$4kCrime & Legal$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$197k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED HOOK INITIATIVE$3,500
PCRF$3,500
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) BOSTON$2,500
CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 8%THE BEYOND BOND & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $3k → 10%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $4k → 20%SISTER SONG THE NATIONAL WOMEN OF COLOR: $5k → 13%CAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $3k → 20%SOLUTIONS AT WORK INC: $3k → 8%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $3k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $3k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33k · 5 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$33k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+29%

Still filing today

60%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RED HOOK INITIATIVE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +13%
  • P
    PCRF
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k
  • PD
    PATRICK DALY SCHOOL OF ARTS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k

Funded once

  • SI
    SISTERSONG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -7%
  • BB
    BEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +103%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brookview House Inc

Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
2
Digital Ready Inc

Digital Ready activates the creative potential of young adults, especially low-income residents, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in Boston's innovation economy.

Education
3
Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association Inc

The mission of the volunteer lawyers project of the boston bar association is to increase access to justice by delivering high quality pro bono civil legal services to eligible clients in the greater boston area.

Crime & Legal
4
Connections Work

Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.

5
Community Counseling of Bristol County Inc

The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…

Health
6
Boston After School & Beyond Inc

Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…

Education
7
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
8
Co-Counsel Nyc Inc

To transform our collective capacity to navigate complex legal systems and support safe, thriving, and engaged immigrant communities.

Crime & Legal
9
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
10
Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education
11
Community Art Center Inc

To cultivate an engaged community of youth whose powerful artistic voices transform their lives, their neighborhoods and their worlds.

Human Services
12
Brookline Community Mental Health Center Inc Dba the Brookline Center

The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cambridge Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Red Hook Art Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RED HOOK INITIATIVE — $12,250 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIVESISTERSONG INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INCCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INCBEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSE — $2,500 · Human ServicesBEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSESOLUTIONS AT WORK INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS AT WORK INCPCRF — $8,500 · OtherPCRFPATRICK DALY SCHOOL OF ARTS — $5,000 · OtherPATRICK DALY SCHOOL OF ARTSGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $3,500 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) BOSTON — $2,500 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) BOSTONJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS) — $2,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES (JVS)CREATIVE ARTS AT PARK — $1,500 · OtherCREATIVE ARTS AT PARKFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $2,500 · EmploymentRED HOOK ART PROJECT INC — $1,250 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$26,250Other$24,000Employment$2,500Arts & Culture$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE — $12,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSISTERSONG INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BOND AND LEGAL DEFENSE — $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetRED HOOK ART PROJECT INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cambridge Community FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cambridge Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Peace Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc39% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Solutions at Work Inc20% of income from government
  • Cambridge Community Center Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Peace Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Peace Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph