Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pawlowski Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$747k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$575k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.6MInternational$981kEducation$402kHealth$277kHuman Services$226kFood & Nutrition$103kScience & Tech$80kHousing & Shelter$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $575k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Relief Services$575,000
Doctors Without Borders$75,000
Augustana College$26,917
St Patrick's Residence$25,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$15,000
Marquette University$12,185
Avon Hospice$10,000
Hesed House$5,000
Feed My Starving Children$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hesed House: $5k → 8%Hesed House: $5k → 8%Hesed House: $5k → 8%Hesed House: $5k → 8%Hesed House: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
CA
CO
MD
AZ
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 19 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+15%

Still filing today

53%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $980k · revenue +98%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +37%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $83k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AF
    Arthritis Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue -7%
  • UO
    University of Illinois
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Musk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1,580,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $121,052 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $82,247 · OtherAvon Hospice: $70,000 · Other+13 more: $176,214 · Other+13 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $980,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA I…+2 more: $3,500 · InternationalST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE: $225,000 · HealthST PATRIC…Avow Foundation Inc: $41,000 · HealthAvow Foun…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · HealthARTHRITIS…DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $82,883 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $79,467 · EducationMarquette University: $52,855 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $38,991 · Education+1 more: $3,598 · EducationNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $75,000 · Food & NutritionPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $25,000 · Human ServicesSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,029,513International$983,500Health$301,000Education$257,794Food & Nutrition$75,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $980,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE: $225,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $82,883 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $79,467 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL HAVEN WEST INC: $65,360 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMarquette University: $52,855 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAvow Foundation Inc: $41,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $38,991 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $3,598 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL HAVEN WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds Avow Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Naples Music Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pawlowski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pawlowski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pawlowski Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph