Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Patrick a Gerschel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$304k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$399kEducation$390kInternational$387kHealth$260kPublic Benefit$100kRecreation & Sports$33kScience & Tech$10kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYRIAD USA$75,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$50,000
THE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATION$50,000
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$30,000
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE$23,700
WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION$15,000
THE FRICK COLLECTION$10,000
WQXR NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO$7,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESERARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE & ART$5,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $12k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of The Patrick a Gerschel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 57%.

The Patrick a Gerschel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 16 repeat orgs$222k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+9%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $87k · revenue +54%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $86k · revenue +307%
  • AV
    ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $33k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATION OF THE UNITED STATESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $110k · revenue +307%
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • W
    WQXR
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
4
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
5
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
Lycee Francais De New York

"citizens of culture and courage"committed to bilingual french and american education of the highest standard, our mission is to prepare students of many origins to be thinkers, innovators and leaders, at home in the world. we inspire and…

Education
8
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
9
Berggruen Institute
Education
10
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
11
Robert Rauschenberg Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $250,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERKING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION OF THE UNITED STATES: $200,000 · OtherKING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION OF THE UNITED STATESTHE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATION: $105,000 · OtherTHE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATIONCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: $100,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONSThe Frick Collection: $39,350 · OtherWQXR NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $27,500 · Other+4 more: $20,500 · OtherCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $150,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS …MYRIAD USA INC: $150,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCTHE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATION OF THE UNITED STATES: $110,000 · InternationalTHE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDAT…THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $160,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLE…THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $25,000 · EducationTHE INSTITUTE …The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $86,300 · Arts & CultureFRENCH INSTITUTE - ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION INC: $87,000 · Human ServicesASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $33,000 · Recreation & SportsINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Other$742,350International$410,000Education$200,000Arts & Culture$101,300Human Services$87,000Recreation & Sports$33,000Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $160,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATION OF THE UNITED STATES: $110,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetWORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION INC: $87,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $86,300 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $39,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRENCH INSTITUTE - ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Patrick a Gerschel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Patrick a Gerschel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Patrick a Gerschel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Patrick a Gerschel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patrick a Gerschel’s filings →

More from the funding graph