Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pat and Fred Bass Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$145kHealth$53kPhilanthropy$35kRecreation & Sports$24kArts & Culture$23kYouth Development$16kReligion$16kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE$27,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$25,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
GODS LOVE WE DELIVER$5,000
CENTRAL CITY CONCERN$5,000
LINES FOR LIFE$5,000
OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING$5,000
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$5,000
CITY HARVEST$3,000
FRESH AIR FUND$3,000
POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE$2,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$2,000
WQXR$2,000
MISTY MEADOWS EQUINE LEARNING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $5k → 6%FOSTER CLUB: $2k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8k → 11%THE GOW SCHOOL: $2k → 13%CITY HARVEST: $3k → 20%CENTRAL CITY CONCERN: $5k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $4k → 6%FOSTER CLUB: $2k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8k → 11%CITY HARVEST: $2k → 20%NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 14%CENTRAL CITY CONCERN: $3k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 11%LINES FOR LIFE: $5k → 17%NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 11%LINES FOR LIFE: $4k → 17%CENTRAL CITY CONCERN: $3k → 12%LINES FOR LIFE: $3k → 17%NAMI: $7k → 17%OREGON FOOD BANK: $25k → 12%CITY OF NEW YORK: $3k → 17%ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%OREGON FOOD BANK: $16k → 12%ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%OREGON FOOD BANK: $8k → 12%ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $6k → 17%POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $5k → 17%OREGON FOOD BANK: $4k → 12%BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE: $27k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE: $15k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE: $14k → 12%PEOPLES TOWN HALL: $15k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE: $13k → 12%PEOPLES TOWN HALL: $3k → 17%CEDAR SINAI PARK: $5k → 12%OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $5k → 12%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $8k → 17%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $5k → 17%WQRX: $5k → 17%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $5k → 17%FRESH AIR FUND: $12k → 17%FRESH AIR FUND: $7k → 17%FRESH AIR FUND: $3k → 17%ARENT FOX SCHIFF: $10k → 17%NPR: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 22 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
19

Total granted

$323k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $52k · revenue +8%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +40%
  • FRESH AIR FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • NN
    NAMI Nationalgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +181%
  • N
    NPR
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
8
United Way of New York City

Uwnyc works with a coalition of trusted partners to unite community power with citywide possibility. together, we meet today's most urgent needs while building transformative solutions for tomorrow - striving for health, opportunity, and…

Philanthropy
9
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
10
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.

Food & Nutrition
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON FOOD BANK: $52,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLINES FOR LIFE: $12,500 · OtherLINES FOR LIFEIndividual grant recipient: $10,241 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $9,000 · OtherWQRX: $7,000 · Other+23 more: $50,250 · Other+23 moreMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $68,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INCGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $17,500 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INCCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC+2 more: $1,500 · Food & NutritionROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $33,500 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFRESH AIR FUND: $23,500 · Recreation & SportsCentral City Concern: $11,000 · HealthNAMI National: $6,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$184,491Food & Nutrition$92,000Philanthropy$34,500Recreation & Sports$23,500Health$18,000Youth Development$11,500Arts & Culture$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $68,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $52,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $33,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $23,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral City Concern: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOW SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Portland: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAWYERS' CAMPAIGN FOR EQUAL JUSTICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Portland ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BROWN HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GLEANERS ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pat and Fred Bass Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pat and Fred Bass Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pat and Fred Bass Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph