Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Past Presidents Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$447k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.3MEnvironment$354kReligion$270kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$45kRecreation & Sports$40k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $277k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GILMOUR ACADEMY$80,000
ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB$72,000
MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
ST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL$35,000
GESU PARISH$30,000
ST DOMINIC PARISH$30,000
PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS CLEVELAND$25,000
ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
BEAUMONT SCHOOL$15,000
RHONDA'S KISS$10,000
CLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS CLEVELAND: $25k → 17%ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 17%MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 17%MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 17%MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 17%MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 17%MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 17%GESU PARISH: $30k → 17%GESU PARISH: $30k → 17%GESU PARISH: $30k → 17%GESU PARISH: $30k → 17%GESU PARISH: $30k → 17%BEAUMONT SCHOOL: $15k → 17%BEAUMONT SCHOOL: $15k → 17%BEAUMONT SCHOOL: $15k → 17%BEAUMONT SCHOOL: $15k → 17%BEAUMONT SCHOOL: $15k → 17%ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $75k → 17%ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $75k → 17%ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $60k → 17%ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $60k → 17%ST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 17%ST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL: $60k → 17%ST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL: $60k → 17%ST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL: $60k → 17%ST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL: $35k → 17%ST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL: $35k → 17%ST DOMINIC PARISH: $30k → 17%ST DOMINIC PARISH: $30k → 17%ST DOMINIC PARISH: $30k → 17%ST DOMINIC PARISH: $30k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $100k → 17%GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $92k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $80k → 17%GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $72k → 17%GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $70k → 17%GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $60k → 17%CLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY: $10k → 17%GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $60k → 17%CLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY: $10k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $60k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $50k → 17%GILMOUR ACADEMY: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+134%

Still filing today

43%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • AO
    ANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • GR
    GRAND RIVER ACADEMY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • B4
    BUFFS 4 LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +134%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $354,000 · OtherGATES MILLS GARDEN CLUBGILMOUR ACADEMY INC: $340,000 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INCST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELAND: $320,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL OF CLEVELANDST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherST MARTIN DE PORRES SCHOOLMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $205,000 · OtherMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOLCHURCH OF THE GESU: $150,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE GESUST DOMINIC PARISH: $120,000 · OtherST DOMINIC PARISHBEAUMONT SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherST EDWARD HIGH SCHOOL: $75,000 · Other+1 more: $15,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $50,000 · PhilanthropyRHONDA'S KISS: $45,000 · PhilanthropyBUFFS 4 LIFE: $40,000 · EducationANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY: $15,000 · EducationCLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY: $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,904,000Philanthropy$95,000Education$55,000Arts & Culture$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB: $354,000 over 5y, 65% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY: $50,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetRHONDA'S KISS: $45,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetBUFFS 4 LIFE: $40,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND RIVER ACADEMY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATES MILLS GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RHONDA'S KISS ↗
  • Who funds BUFFS 4 LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Laub Foundation · The Veale Foundation · The Howley Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Past Presidents Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Past Presidents Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Past Presidents Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Past Presidents Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Past Presidents’ filings →

    More from the funding graph