Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pasquinelli Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$175k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MHuman Services$443kReligion$218kRecreation & Sports$170kFood & Nutrition$168kHealth$111kInternational$19kPhilanthropy$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YUMA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$55,000
CATHOLIC EXTENSION$50,000
ST CHARLES CATHOLIC CHURCH$27,000
MIKE MCCOY MINISTRIES$7,500
FOOD FOR THE POOR$7,300
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AIDS$5,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF YUMA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SUSAN B ANTHONY PRO-LIFE AMERICA EDUCATION FUND$2,500
JAZZ OF YUMA INC$1,800
CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD$1,750
YUMA LUTHERAN SCHOOL$1,500
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$1,000
ST FRANCIS CHURCH$1,000
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $50k → 32%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $1k → 14%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 → 14%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $800 → 15%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 → 14%CROSSROADS MISSION: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $750 → 15%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $250 → 14%ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 11%CROSSROADS MISSION: $2k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $500 → 15%CROSSROADS MISSION: $1k → 15%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF YUMA INC: $1k → 15%CROSSROADS MISSION: $1k → 15%CROSSROADS MISSION: $750 → 15%CROSSROADS MISSION: $750 → 15%CROSSROADS MISSION: $500 → 15%HOOPS HOUSE: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 44 repeat orgs$426k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
44

Total granted

$1.8M
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    4× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +103%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AIDS INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • CM
    CROSSROADS MISSION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • SX
    SAN XAVIER MISSION SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $80k
  • SC
    SAN CARLOS ROMAN CATHOLIC COMM
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
  • CE
    CATHOLIC EXTENSION
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
3
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
4
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
8
Association of Catholic Colleges and University

The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…

—
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
11
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
12
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Healing Journey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
32/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YUMA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL -YUMA ARIZONA: $937,135 · EducationYUMA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL -YUMA ARIZONAUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $170,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac+4 more: $17,000 · EducationCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $369,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICESST FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $144,250 · OtherST FRANCIS OF ASSISI CATHOLIC SCHOOLTHE UNIVERSITY OF AZ FOUNDATION: $83,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF AZ FOUNDATIONSAN XAVIER MISSION SCHOOL: $79,500 · OtherSAN XAVIER MISSION SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER: $73,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMERSAN CARLOS ROMAN CATHOLIC COMM: $70,000 · OtherSAN CARLOS ROMAN CATHOLIC COMMCATHOLIC EXTENSION: $60,000 · OtherCATHOLIC EXTENSION+62 more: $243,200 · Other+62 moreTHE HANSEN HOUSE: $50,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AIDS INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,500 · HealthFoundation of Yuma Regional Medical Center: $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,250 · Health+5 more: $3,600 · HealthLittle Sisters of the Poor of NM Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS MISSION: $7,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $7,050 · Human Services+5 more: $5,750 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $21,800 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $9,950 · InternationalDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $10,500 · ReligionTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 · ReligionHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor: $1,000 · ReligionYUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $11,350 · Food & NutritionThe Healing Journey Inc: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,124,135Other$1,121,950Health$75,350Human Services$70,300International$31,750Religion$16,500Food & Nutrition$12,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYUMA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL -YUMA ARIZONA: $937,135 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Sisters of the Poor of NM Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HANSEN HOUSE: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $21,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $11,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AIDS INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $9,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS MISSION: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $7,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJazz of Yuma Inc: $6,400 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation of Yuma Regional Medical Center: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPoverello House: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor: $1,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSTRAWBERRY FIELDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOPS HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild & Family Services of Yuma Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS FREEDOM COALITION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYuma Territory Live Steamers Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCaringBridge: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTER'S ARMY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVision Charitable Trust: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YUMA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL -YUMA ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Little Sisters of the Poor of NM Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HANSEN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds YUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds MIKE MCCOY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds Susan B Anthony List Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jazz of Yuma Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Foundation of Yuma Regional Medical Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ22.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Caroline Lott Jessen Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pasquinelli Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pasquinelli Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Pasquinelli Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Pasquinelli Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pasquinelli’s filings →

More from the funding graph