Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$200kHealth$112kCivil Rights$83kReligion$68kCommunity Improvement$43kInternational$20kArts & Culture$16kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHBISHOP HOBAN HIGH SCHOOL$53,000
NORTHERN OHIO ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION$19,750
SETON CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
WOMEN'S RELIGIOUS ARCHIVES COLLABORATION$10,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
ITALIAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS CLUB$2,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$423k · 10 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$423k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+46%

Still filing today

30%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ARCHBISHOP HOBAN HIGH SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $126k
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    5× · 2017–2025 · $87k
  • NO
    NORTHERN OHIO ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $83k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • PO
    PATRONS OF THE ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPHS PARISH
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Italian American Executives of Transporatation - Charitable Fdn

To assist in educational programs and educational activities to be of charitable assistence whenever possible to italian-american groups and other worthwhile organizations to promote personal acquaintances and friendly relations between…

Education
2
Center for Italian American Memoryfoundation Inc
—
3
Chicagoland Italian American Charitable Organization

Provide scholarships to deserving entry level college students regardless of race, gender, religious affiation or national origin. also make donations to disabled war veterans, first responders, and families in need.

Education
4
Italian American Nat'l Hall of Fame

To honor individuals for their contributions to the italian american community

—
5
Stark County Italian American Festival Foundation Inc

The purpose of the Foundation is to promote and further the interests of all persons who support and espouse the Italian culture in America. We operate a yearly festival with funds generated used for the sole purpose of awarding…

Unclassified
6
American Friends of Italian Jewry Inc
—
7
Italian-American Heritage Society of Notre Dame-Michiana Inc

Provide Scholarships

Education
8
Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi Inc

To provide service to people in need and to address social ills that undermind the dignity of the person. the ultimate goal of catholic charities is to create positive life changing opportunities for those in need without regard to color,…

—
9
Sons & Daughters of Italy Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
10
Caruso Family Charities
Philanthropy
11
Italian Heritage and Culture Committee of Ny Inc

Celebrate italian heritage and culture among italian americans and intercultural understanding & appreciation among all ethnic groups

—
12
The Scholarship Granting Organization of the Catholic Community Foundation

The angel scholarship fund (asf) serves as the scholarship granting organization of the catholic community foundation. its mission is to promote the state of ohio scholarship tax credit program with all who support catholic education in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart to Heart International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Rwandan Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP HOBAN HIGH SCHOOL INC: $126,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP HOBAN HIGH SCHOOL INCCLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $87,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'S HOSPITALNORTHERN OHIO ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $83,250 · OtherNORTHERN OHIO ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONSETON CATHOLIC SCHOOL OF HUDSON: $50,000 · OtherSETON CATHOLIC SCHOOL OF HUDSONTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+19 more: $153,055 · Other+19 moreHands Together Inc: $15,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF RWANDAN EDUCATION INC: $2,500 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 · InternationalITALIAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLUB: $15,250 · Arts & CultureCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$524,305International$20,000Arts & Culture$15,250Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetITALIAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLUB: $15,250 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetHands Together Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN RELIGIOUS ARCHIVES COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF RWANDAN EDUCATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ITALIAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL AND BUSINESS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗
  • Who funds ITALIAN AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL BUSINESSMENS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN RELIGIOUS ARCHIVES COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RWANDAN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Louis B & Joan M Perry Family FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Louis B & Joan M Perry Family Foundation · The Fedeli Family Charitable Foundation · Hudson Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph