Loading…
· Private foundation
THE PANOZ FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$2.1M
Granted FY2021
3
Grants
2
Communities
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2021.
Human Services$1.1MHealth$1.1MPhilanthropy$65kReligion$50kEducation$31kAnimals$10kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$62k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
parents
2019
—
2020
—
2021
ranch
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2021 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.1M
$1,037,796
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH$1,037,796
- EAGLE RANCH$1,037,796
- PLACE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC$17,505
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 5 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
15
Total granted
$2.2M
$206k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+54%
+78%
Still filing today
100%
47%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH4× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +359% · 26% of their budget
EAGLE RANCH2× · 2017–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +37%- CHCOMMUNITY HELPING PLACE2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- SFSPECIAL FORCES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $65k · revenue +90%
- WLWELLSPRING LIVING INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +78%
- GAGEORGIA AGAPEone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
A Place of Hope North Georgia Inc
Facilitating the care of underpriveledged children including the care of foster children.
Housing & Shelter
2
Green Oaks Center
The center achieves day and employment services, personal living and residential support and family support for the mentally challenged citizens of colquitt and worth counties of georgia.
Human Services
3
Soaring Wings Ranch Inc
Soaring wings is a christ-centered home for children while working with their families to overcome challenges they are facing for as long as needed.
Youth Development
4
Hope Harbor Inc
Hope Harbor offers an immersive family reconciliation program designed to give your family the tools and support you need to navigate the storm, so you can enjoy peace and hope in your home. Hope Harbor serves adolescents and their…
Human Services
5
Wellspring Counseling Inc
Wellspring counseling, inc is a faith-based, non-profit organization that provides outreach programs for mental health services and education in a professional, christian and holistic way in order to bring about transforming change in…
Health
6
Lifegate Counseling Center
At lifegate counseling center at peachtree, our vision is to foster an environment in which lives are transformed, relationships are reconciled and hope is found. we offer a vast array of faith-sensitive physotherapeutic services and…
Health
7
Cumming Home Ministries Inc
Support and sponsor those experiencing hopelessness and homelessness, through residential rehabilitation, recovery and treatment programs, Christian-based spiritual mentopring and counseling, life skills training and resources infused with…
Housing & Shelter
8
Wellspring
Wellspring empowers individuals and families to make fundamental life changes through exceptional counceling and community outreach that improves quality of life.
—
9
Calvary Children's Home
To provide a safe loving christian environment for children needing placement apart from their famillies.
Human Services
10
Grace Retreat Fostercare and Adoption
We are a licensing agency contracted by the state of arizona. we are committed to support families through the process of becoming licensed and providing a home for children. we believe that by supporting the families, they are able to…
Human Services
11
Carolina Adoption Services Inc
Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption supports for children, youth and adoptive families.
Human Services
12
Christian Family Care Agency Inc
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on four pillars: preservation,…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wellspring Living Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$1,115,389Health$1,060,796Philanthropy$65,000Other$61,500Religion$50,000Education$31,000Animals$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH ↗
- Who funds EAGLE RANCH ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL FORCES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CLEARWATER ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HELPING PLACE ↗
- Who funds HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA AGAPE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF WESLEY WOODS ↗
- Who funds CANINE PET RESCUE ↗
- Who funds AUDITORY VERBAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation for GreaterGA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE PANOZ FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.6× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 201614712 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CHESTNUT MOUNTAIN RANCH, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 26% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Panoz Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Panoz Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines