· Private foundation
The Panama Street Fund Co Langer Grogan & Diver PC
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of THE PANAMA STREET FUND CO LANGER GROGAN & DIVER PC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $132k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FAMILY CHILDRENS SERVICES | $50,000 |
| PHILABUNDANCE | $25,300 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $20,000 |
| PROJECT HOME | $20,000 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $20,000 |
| CHABAD OF NW PHILADELPHIA | $17,000 |
| MAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| AMERICA GIVES | $10,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $10,000 |
| AHAVAS TORAH CONGREGATION | $7,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF PHILADELPHIA | $6,000 |
| PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER | $5,000 |
| HIAS PA | $5,000 |
| FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA | $3,000 |
| PA INNOCENCE PROJECT | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION6× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +84%
Philabundance6× · 2019–2024 · $133k · revenue +83%- TMThe Magee Memorial Hospital for Convalescents7× · 2017–2024 · $75k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- LOLUBAVITCH OF NW PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2019 · $66k
- KKRISTOFC19IMPACTORGone grant, 2020 · $30k
- TCTHE CCNY EMEREGENCY FUNDS PROGRAMone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
In order to promote social harmony and inter-religious understanding, Interfaith Philadelphia equips individuals and communities for interfaith engagement, builds collaborative relationships, and stands in solidarity with our diverse…
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
Provides free immigration legal services to immigrants, refugees, foreign-born individuals and their family members who reside in pennsylvania. individuals receiving the services are those who are unable to afford the services of a private…
Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.
Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…
The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…
Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.
Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds The Magee Memorial Hospital for Convalescents ↗
- Who funds THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds THE CITY COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds HIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc ↗
- Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
- Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD TRUST ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds KINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Independence Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Samuel S Fels Fund · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The Alfred and Mary Douty Foundation · Union Benevolent Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Panama Street Fund Co Langer Grogan & Diver PC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Panama Street Fund Co Langer Grogan & Diver PC?
Find your warmest path to The Panama Street Fund Co Langer Grogan & Diver PC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.