Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Palm Tree Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$920kReligion$917kRecreation & Sports$76kHealth$54kInternational$47kEducation$27kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $220k
$3,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$220,000
SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$12,500
CONGREGATION KOL EMETH$5,954
Individual grant recipient$5,470
GIVEBUTTER SHALEM SCHOOL$5,400
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$4,000
THEATER YOU$3,600
OSHMAN FAMILY JCC$3,600
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION$3,000
WOMEN'S AUDIO MISSION$1,800
ATHERTON POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOC$500
HOOVER INSTITUTION$360
FRIENDS OF ATHERTON LIBRARY$300
P T LIBRARY$180
KQED$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN COMMUNITY: $5k → 7%Sartorette Home and School Club: $1k → 8%WOMEN'S AUDIO MISSION: $2k → 10%Summit for Stem Cell Foundation: $1k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $24k → 17%NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%UC Foundation: $10k → 16%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $13k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVIC: $5k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE: $5k → 17%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN COMMUNITY: $3k → 7%OSHMAN FAMILY JCC: $5k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVIC: $900 → 10%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE: $5k → 17%SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $4k → 8%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $3k → 17%FILOLI: $11k → 7%OSHMAN FAMILY JCC: $4k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP: $720 → 17%FILOLI: $1k → 7%OSHMAN FAMILY JCC: $4k → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250k → 10%LIMMUD FSU INTERNATIONAL: $800 → 17%OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENT: $750 → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo: $250k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $4k → 17%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $225k → 10%AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE: $10k → 17%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $220k → 10%PARKINSON'S INSTITUTE: $20k → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo: $220k → 10%CONGREAGATION BETH ANN: $5k → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $210k → 10%FHDA FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo: $170k → 10%KRAUSE CENTER FOR INNOVATION: $2k → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo: $146k → 10%FOOTHILL COLLEGE: $2k → 8%CONGREGATION KOL EMETH: $6k → 8%PERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo: $109k → 10%THE SECOND OPINION: $4k → 10%GIVEBUTTER SHALEM SCHOOL: $5k → 8%GIVEBUTTER SHALEM SCHOOL: $2k → 8%THEATER YOU: $4k → 8%CONGREGATION KOL EMETH: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 15 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
16

Total granted

$2.0M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-9%

Still filing today

40%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    4× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +479%
  • SV
    SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +31%
  • OF
    OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    4× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • Northwestern Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +33%
  • PI
    PARKINSON'S INSTITUTE AND CLINICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Atherton Police Officers Assn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $905,000 · OtherPERSIMMON FOUNDATION JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo: $894,878 · OtherPERSIMMON FOUNDATION jewish comm Fo+28 more: $146,580 · Other+28 moreNorthwestern University: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $26,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 · InternationalTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $33,300 · Health+1 more: $1,033 · HealthAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $4,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $180 · Arts & CultureWomens Audio Mission: $1,800 · EmploymentFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $720 · Youth Development
Other$1,946,458Recreation & Sports$75,000International$46,500Health$34,333Arts & Culture$4,180Employment$1,800Youth Development$720

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $33,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $26,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $16,215 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $13,179 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Audio Mission: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT FOR STEM CELL FOUNDATION: $1,033 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH STUDY NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds Womens Audio Mission ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT FOR STEM CELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Atherton Police Officers Assn ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH STUDY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Intuit Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Palm Tree Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Palm Tree Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Palm Tree’s filings →

    More from the funding graph