Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pacey Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$102kEducation$81kRecreation & Sports$62kReligion$28kArts & Culture$28kFood & Nutrition$23kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAM$10,000
LIFEWORKS$7,500
ST LOUISE HOUSE$7,000
YMCA$5,000
SAFE$5,000
MAINSPRING SCHOOLS$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH$5,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES$4,000
CHARIOT (DRIVE A SENIOR)$4,000
RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BALLET AUSTIN$2,000
TRAVIS COUNTY SWIM CLUB$2,000
AUSTIN LYRIC OPERA$2,000
MAKARIOS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIFEWORKS AUSTIN: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 22 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$333k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+49%

Still filing today

59%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • B
    BREAKTHROUGH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +119%
  • AY
    AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • YA
    YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +49%
  • SE
    ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RB
    RIO BRAVO MINISTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
3
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
4
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
5
TexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts

TexARTS is an arts education and performance destination that builds character, professionalism, and careers. Its mission is to cultivate a thriving arts community by exposing all people to the visual and performing arts. TexARTS prepares…

Arts & Culture
6
Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc

For austinites of every background, the long center is the community gathering place that offers the most diverse programming and stunning views of the city, so that together, everyone can experience remarkable live arts & entertainment.

Arts & Culture
7
Austin Playhouse

Austin Playhouse creates opportunities for artists and audiences to celebrate the human experience through professional theatrical productions that nourish minds, delight spirits, and enrich lives.

Arts & Culture
8
Austin Revitalization Authority

To encourage residential, commercial, and cultural development that promotes community well-being, while respecting the people, institutions and history of east austin and other underserved communities.

Community Improvement
9
Ballet Austin Foundation

The foundation was established in 1998 to encourage public support of ballet austin and to receive, manage and invest contributions for the exclusive benefit of ballet austin.

Philanthropy
10
Paramount Theatre for the Performing Arts Inc

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture
11
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
12
Austin Pride Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ballet Austin Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Mark Felice Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAM: $40,000 · OtherST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAMLIFEWORKS: $35,500 · OtherLIFEWORKSST LOUISE HOUSE: $23,000 · OtherST LOUISE HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHARIOT (DRIVE A SENIOR): $14,000 · OtherCHARIOT (DRIVE A SENIOR)YMCA: $10,000 · OtherYMCAST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRA: $10,000 · OtherST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAFOOD FOR THE SOUL: $8,000 · Other+6 more: $5,500 · OtherMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $40,250 · EducationMAINSPRING SCHOOLS …BREAKTHROUGH: $21,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGHFUN4SENIORS: $27,000 · Recreation & SportsFUN4SENIORSAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN YMBL SUN…TRAVIS COUNTRY SWIM CLUB: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA: $10,100 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN LYRI…BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET AUST…Creative Action: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCreative Ac…AUSTIN ZOO INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN ZOO …AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $3,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEA…CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $15,000 · ReligionRIO BRAVO MINISTRIES: $12,500 · ReligionYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Human ServicesMark Felice Foundation: $6,500 · PhilanthropyMAKARIOS: $6,500 · International
Other$160,500Education$61,250Recreation & Sports$49,000Arts & Culture$37,600Religion$27,500Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$6,500International$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC: $40,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIO BRAVO MINISTRIES: $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA: $10,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Action: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMark Felice Foundation: $6,500 over 5y, 16% of budgetMAKARIOS: $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN ZOO INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS COUNTRY SWIM CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRIVE A SENIOR NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds FUN4SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN LYRIC OPERA ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Creative Action ↗
  • Who funds Mark Felice Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAKARIOS ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS COUNTRY SWIM CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds DRIVE A SENIOR NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Topfer Family Foundation · Better Business Bureau · The Powell Foundation · The Seawell Elam Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · The Applied Materials Foundation · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · United Way Worldwide · One Skye Foundation Inc · Ecg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pacey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pacey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pacey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph