Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Pacey Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$102kEducation$81kRecreation & Sports$62kReligion$28kArts & Culture$28kFood & Nutrition$23kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAM$10,000
LIFEWORKS$7,500
ST LOUISE HOUSE$7,000
MAINSPRING SCHOOLS$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH$5,000
YMCA$5,000
SAFE$5,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES$4,000
CHARIOT (DRIVE A SENIOR)$4,000
RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
MAKARIOS$2,000
BALLET AUSTIN$2,000
TRAVIS COUNTY SWIM CLUB$2,000
AUSTIN LYRIC OPERA$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIFEWORKS AUSTIN: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$333k · 22 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$333k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+49%

Still filing today

59%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • B
    BREAKTHROUGH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +119%
  • AY
    AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • YA
    YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +49%
  • SE
    ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRA
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • RB
    RIO BRAVO MINISTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
3
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
4
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
5
TexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts

TexARTS is an arts education and performance destination that builds character, professionalism, and careers. Its mission is to cultivate a thriving arts community by exposing all people to the visual and performing arts. TexARTS prepares…

Arts & Culture
6
Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc

For austinites of every background, the long center is the community gathering place that offers the most diverse programming and stunning views of the city, so that together, everyone can experience remarkable live arts & entertainment.

Arts & Culture
7
Austin Playhouse

Austin Playhouse creates opportunities for artists and audiences to celebrate the human experience through professional theatrical productions that nourish minds, delight spirits, and enrich lives.

Arts & Culture
8
Austin Revitalization Authority

To encourage residential, commercial, and cultural development that promotes community well-being, while respecting the people, institutions and history of east austin and other underserved communities.

Community Improvement
9
Ballet Austin Foundation

The foundation was established in 1998 to encourage public support of ballet austin and to receive, manage and invest contributions for the exclusive benefit of ballet austin.

Philanthropy
10
Paramount Theatre for the Performing Arts Inc

We're here to inspire generations. we connect people and strengthen community by showcasing unforgettable performances across genres, providing life-changing arts education programs, and dreaming up magical experiences in iconic venues…

Arts & Culture
11
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
12
Austin Pride Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ballet Austin Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Mark Felice Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAM — $40,000 · OtherST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAMLIFEWORKS — $35,500 · OtherLIFEWORKSST LOUISE HOUSE — $23,000 · OtherST LOUISE HOUSEIndividual grant recipient — $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHARIOT (DRIVE A SENIOR) — $14,000 · OtherCHARIOT (DRIVE A SENIOR)YMCA — $10,000 · OtherYMCAST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRA — $10,000 · OtherST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY CAMP PROGRAFOOD FOR THE SOUL — $8,000 · Other+6 more — $5,500 · OtherMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC — $40,250 · EducationMAINSPRING SCHOOLS …BREAKTHROUGH — $21,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGHFUN4SENIORS — $27,000 · Recreation & SportsFUN4SENIORSAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN YMBL SUN…TRAVIS COUNTRY SWIM CLUB — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA — $10,100 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN LYRI…BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET AUST…Creative Action — $7,000 · Arts & CultureCreative Ac…AUSTIN ZOO INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN ZOO …AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $3,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEA…CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $15,000 · ReligionRIO BRAVO MINISTRIES — $12,500 · ReligionYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Human ServicesMark Felice Foundation — $6,500 · PhilanthropyMAKARIOS — $6,500 · International
Other$160,500Education$61,250Recreation & Sports$49,000Arts & Culture$37,600Religion$27,500Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$6,500International$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC — $40,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH — $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP — $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIO BRAVO MINISTRIES — $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA — $10,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Action — $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMark Felice Foundation — $6,500 over 5y, 16% of budgetMAKARIOS — $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN ZOO INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS COUNTRY SWIM CLUB — $2,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRIVE A SENIOR NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds FUN4SENIORS
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH
  • Who funds AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
  • Who funds RIO BRAVO MINISTRIES
  • Who funds AUSTIN LYRIC OPERA
  • Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Creative Action
  • Who funds Mark Felice Foundation
  • Who funds MAKARIOS
  • Who funds AUSTIN ZOO INC
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds TRAVIS COUNTRY SWIM CLUB
  • Who funds CAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
  • Who funds DRIVE A SENIOR NETWORK
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Topfer Family Foundation · Better Business Bureau · The Powell Foundation · The Seawell Elam Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · The Applied Materials Foundation · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · United Way Worldwide · One Skye Foundation Inc · Ecg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Pacey Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph