Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Owen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$114k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.3MHuman Services$171kHealth$96kReligion$57kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kYouth Development$30kRecreation & Sports$25kCrime & Legal$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $114k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$114,400
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$25,000
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$25,000
LIFELONG ACCESS$10,000
OASIS COMMUNITY OUTREACH$5,000
INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM FOUNDATION$5,000
MONDO'S MISSION INC$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
INTERNATIONAL OCD FOUNDATION$5,000
YMCA BLM-NRML CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER OF CENTRAL IL$5,000
EUREKA COLLEGE$5,000
MID CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC$5,000
WESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BLMNORMAL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $4k → 14%MARCFIRST: $10k → 11%LIFELONG ACCESS: $10k → 11%LIFELONG ACCESS: $10k → 11%MARCFIRST: $5k → 11%LIFELONG ACCESS: $5k → 11%MARCFIRST: $5k → 11%MARCFIRST: $5k → 11%MARCFIRST: $5k → 11%FAITH IN ACTION OF BLMNORMAL: $3k → 11%FAITH IN ACTION OF BLOOM-NORMAL: $2k → 11%MARCFIRST: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 33 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
18

Total granted

$1.7M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+102%

Still filing today

52%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $765k · revenue +24%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $186k · revenue +127%
  • IW
    ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $169k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AT
    ALLIN TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • AC
    ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +18%
  • PC
    PET CENTRAL HELPS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
2
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

5
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
6
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

7
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
9
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Benefit, perform, and carry out the charitable, educational, and other exempt purposes of indiana university health ball memorial hospital, inc. ("iu health ball memorial hospital") and related organizations, and to support activities…

10
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Little City Foundation

To ensure that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are provided with the best options and opportunities to live safely, work productively, explore creatively, learn continuously and play pleasurably throughout their…

Human Services
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Youth and Family Solutions and the most unlike its peers is Parker Kemp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and SanctuaryYouth Sports BoostersCommunity Health SystemsChild and Family ServicesEducation & Literacy Progra…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%12%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr17%7%20–35yr15%3%35–55yr17%81%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
15%
5,304/34,677

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $764,900 · EducationILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $186,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $169,200 · EducationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYEUREKA COLLEGE — $118,000 · EducationEUREKA COLLEGEHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC — $39,000 · OtherHOME SWEET HOME MINISTR…Individual grant recipient — $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…MID CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $32,000 · OtherMID CENTRAL COMMUNITY A…ALLIN TOWNSHIP FIRE PROT DISTRICT — $30,000 · OtherALLIN TOWNSHIP FIRE PRO…YMCA BLM-NRML CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherYMCA BLM-NRML CHARITABL…THE SALVATION ARMY — $20,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYALLIN TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT — $20,000 · OtherALLIN TOWNSHIP FIRE DEP…MONDOS MISSION INC — $20,000 · OtherMONDOS MISSION INCCENTER FOR HOPE OUTREACH PROGRAM — $19,500 · OtherCENTER FOR HOPE OUTREAC…ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUND — $17,400 · OtherALLIN TOWNSHIP PARK DISTRICT — $16,000 · Other+31 more — $90,435 · Other+31 moreInternational OCD Foundation Inc — $28,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $26,200 · HealthAUTISM MCLEAN — $16,000 · HealthTHE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · HealthADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthOSF Healthcare Foundation — $4,000 · Health+1 more — $400 · HealthLIFELONG ACCESS — $57,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION OF BLOOMINGTON NORMAL — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS — $4,000 · Human ServicesMIRACLE LEAGUE OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC — $7,000 · Recreation & SportsPET CENTRAL HELPS — $5,000 · Animals
Education$1,238,100Other$364,335Health$88,600Human Services$66,000Recreation & Sports$7,000Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $764,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $186,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $169,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEUREKA COLLEGE — $118,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLIFELONG ACCESS — $57,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC — $39,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMID CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $32,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc — $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $26,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM MCLEAN — $16,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC — $7,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetWESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION OF BLOOMINGTON NORMAL — $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKER KEMP FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EUREKA COLLEGE
  • Who funds LIFELONG ACCESS
  • Who funds HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MID CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds International OCD Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds AUTISM MCLEAN
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds WESTERN AVENUE COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION OF BLOOMINGTON NORMAL
  • Who funds PET CENTRAL HELPS
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare Foundation
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds PARKER KEMP FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Illinois Prairie Community Foundation IncIL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Illinois Prairie Community Foundation Inc · Parker Kemp Foundation · United Way of McLean County · Russell and Betty Shirk Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Snyder Family Foundation Nfp · The Growmark Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Owen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph