Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Owen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$252kHuman Services$73kCommunity Improvement$19kInternational$8kHousing & Shelter$7kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$106k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$22,600
WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY$2,000
ROTARY FOUNDATION$1,000
DERBYSHIRE BAPTIST CHURCH$1,000
LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDENS$250
FROG LEVEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $600 → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $550 → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $500 → 22%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $500 → 22%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $300 → 22%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $250 → 22%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $250 → 22%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY: $2k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $200 → 22%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY: $2k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER RICHMOND: $175 → 22%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY: $1k → 9%WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY: $1k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $150 → 22%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 → 22%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
VA
MD
TN
SC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$366k · 24 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$366k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
0%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $21k · revenue +206%
  • WC
    WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +76%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF MECHANICSVILLE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • MR
    MECHANICSVILLE ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vpm Media Corporation

To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…

Arts & Culture
2
Uva Prince William Medical Center

Our mission transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond. our vision to be the nation's leading public academic health system and a best place to work - while transforming patient care, research, education, and…

Health
3
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
4
Uva Community Health Inc

Our mission: transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond. our vision: to be the nation's leading public academic health system and a best place to work - while transforming patient care, research, education, and…

Health
5
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont Inc

Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…

Employment
6
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
7
Virginia Mason Medical Center

Virginia mason medical center's (the medical center) mission is to improve the health and well-being of the patients it services through the delivery of high quality, cost-effective care. the medical center provides integrated health…

Health
8
Virginia Center for Public Press

Vcpp operates wrir 97.3 lpfm, a community low power fm radio station serving citizens of the city of richmond, virginia, and surrounding counties. the station covers a listening area of approximately 5-7 miles. wrir broadcasts news, views…

Arts & Culture
9
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
10
Maymont Foundation

The maymont foundation is committed to creating experiences that delight, educate and inspire.

Arts & Culture
11
Rappahannock Westminster-Canterbury Foundation

Primary mission is to extend the facilities and services of rw-c inc. to aid as many deserving individuals as can prudently be supported with the funds available to the foundation.

Education
12
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769); the most unlike its peers is Bluemont Concert Series Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $250,748 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHATLEE STATION FAMILY YMCA: $35,100 · OtherATLEE STATION FAMILY YMCAHANOVER ROTARY CLUB: $17,775 · OtherHANOVER ROTARY CLUB+25 more: $24,125 · Other+25 moreWESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $21,400 · Human ServicesWESTMINST…WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesWESTMINST…GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $3,150 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMA…+2 more: $525 · Human ServicesTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 · InternationalCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $3,878 · InternationalHANOVER AND KING WILLIAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3,250 · Housing & ShelterCARITAS: $1,100 · Housing & ShelterFEED MORE INC: $3,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $300 · Crime & LegalTHE 100 CLUB INC: $200 · Crime & LegalLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $350 · EnvironmentJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $100 · Environment
Other$327,748Human Services$31,075International$7,878Housing & Shelter$4,350Food & Nutrition$3,600Crime & Legal$500Environment$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION: $21,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $3,878 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER AND KING WILLIAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $3,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES: $3,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY PLANET INCORPORATED: $2,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBluemont Concert Series Ltd: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769): $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER CHRISTMAS MOTHER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER AND KING WILLIAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds DAILY PLANET INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bluemont Concert Series Ltd ↗
  • Who funds FROG LEVEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769) ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Kathryn & W H Schwarzschild Fund · Louise B Cochrane Charitable Founda · Carmax Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Owen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Owen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Owen Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph