Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Otto and Hanna Duetsch Private Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$97kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kFood & Nutrition$21kAnimals$21kHealth$15kEducation$15kCrime & Legal$10kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$582k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINDSOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA$10,000
NORTHBRIDGE CHURCH$5,000
DOWNSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA$5,000
EAST BRANCH COMMUNITY CHURCH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
WINDSOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC$2,000
CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Guiding Eyes For The Blind: $3k → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $2k → 9%CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $5k → 20%CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $2k → 20%Crime Victims Assistance Center: $2k → 20%CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 20%Life Choices Center Inc: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$169k · 18 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
24

Total granted

$169k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+54%

Still filing today

44%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +145%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • MR
    MOTOR RACING OUTREACH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • CA
    Chi Alpha Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • WC
    WINDSOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - KEY CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
2
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
3
Brooklyn Bridge Animal Welfare Coalition

The mission of brooklyn bridge animal welfare coalition (bbawc) is to empower people and communities to be more compassionate by experiencing a commitment to cat welfare. specifically, our focus is to proactively address the root causes of…

Animals
4
Happy Farm Animal Rescue Inc

To provide for the various needs of indigent farm animals

Animals
5
Shire Rescue and Sanctuary Inc

Animal welfare

Animals
6
Nevada Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.

Animals
7
Animal Rescue Force Inc

The mission of the animal rescue force inc. is to promote and support the care and well being of pets by providing assistance to people in need in order to allow them to keep their pets with their families and reduce the number of…

Animals
8
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
Wayward Ranch Animal Sanctuary Inc

The organization is an animal rescue and sanctuary that provides quality life to the animals who need it the most.

Animals
11
The Animal Rights Alliance Inc

Our mission is to help put an end to pet overpopulation and to help end the needless suffering of animals.

—
12
Bonnies Animal Rescue Kingdom

A rescue group dedicated to rescuing abandoned, neglected, and abused animals, committed to helping one of the poorest county shelters in north carolina by pulling dogs and puppies from the shelter every six to eight weeks and by helping…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alley Cat Allies Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

East Branch Fire DepartmentEMS: $40,000 · OtherEast Branch Fire DepartmentEMSCALVALRY'S LOVE CHURCH: $20,600 · OtherCALVALRY'S LOVE CHURCHCLAVARY'S LOVE CHURCH: $15,200 · OtherCLAVARY'S LOVE CHURCHBRIDGEWATER CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherBRIDGEWATER CHURCHWINDSOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherTOWN OF HANCOCK AMBULANCE: $10,000 · OtherMOTOR RACING OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherEAST BRANCH COMMUNITY CHURCH: $7,000 · Other+25 more: $77,100 · Other+25 moreCRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY AND RELIEF ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 · AnimalsAlley Cat Allies Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE CLOUD FOUNDATION: $1,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthWINDSOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $6,000 · HealthGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyRaceline Ministry: $2,000 · PhilanthropyROADRACING WORLD ACTION FUND: $3,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$209,900Human Services$16,500Animals$14,000Health$12,000Philanthropy$4,000Public Safety & Disaster$3,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINDSOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $6,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY AND RELIEF ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Tier Animal Rescue Inc: $2,100 over 1y, 21% of budgetLIFE CHOICES CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLOUD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDSOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY AND RELIEF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds ROADRACING WORLD ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Southern Tier Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Otto and Hanna Duetsch Private Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Otto and Hanna Duetsch Private Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Otto and Hanna Duetsch Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph