· Private foundation
The Otto and Hanna Duetsch Private Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of THE OTTO AND HANNA DUETSCH PRIVATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WINDSOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| DOWNSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| NORTHBRIDGE CHURCH | $5,000 |
| EAST BRANCH COMMUNITY CHURCH | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER | $2,000 |
| WINDSOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $2,000 |
| BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| DELAWARE OPPORTUNITIES INC | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +54% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +10%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC2× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +145%- GEGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC2× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- MRMOTOR RACING OUTREACH MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · $9k
- CAChi Alpha Ministriesone grant, 2021 · $5k
- BCBridge Community Centerone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…
The mission of brooklyn bridge animal welfare coalition (bbawc) is to empower people and communities to be more compassionate by experiencing a commitment to cat welfare. specifically, our focus is to proactively address the root causes of…
To provide for the various needs of indigent farm animals
Animal welfare
Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.
The mission of the animal rescue force inc. is to promote and support the care and well being of pets by providing assistance to people in need in order to allow them to keep their pets with their families and reduce the number of…
Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.
The organization is an animal rescue and sanctuary that provides quality life to the animals who need it the most.
Our mission is to help put an end to pet overpopulation and to help end the needless suffering of animals.
A rescue group dedicated to rescuing abandoned, neglected, and abused animals, committed to helping one of the poorest county shelters in north carolina by pulling dogs and puppies from the shelter every six to eight weeks and by helping…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alley Cat Allies Inc and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRIME VICTIMS ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WINDSOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds BROOME COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY AND RELIEF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds ROADRACING WORLD ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds Southern Tier Animal Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗
- Who funds Raceline Ministry ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Otto and Hanna Duetsch Private Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.