Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Osprey Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$790k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$16MEnvironment$4.4MReligion$3.9MPhilanthropy$3.0MHealth$2.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.0MEducation$1.8MPublic Benefit$950kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+9 grants · $4.1M
$150,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$790,000
IRC INTERNATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION$700,000
FRONTIER FINANCE SOLUTIONS BV(CARDONA)$500,000
Individual grant recipient$425,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC$403,325
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$400,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$350,000
WATERAID AMERICA INC$300,000
ACUMEN FUND INC$250,000
INTERFAITH AMERICA$200,000
BURN MANUFACTURING$200,000
IMA WORLD HEALTH$195,874
BURN DESIGN LAB$187,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$150,000
ON BEING PROJECT$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WATER 4 INC: $30k → 16%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $1.1M → 14%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $196k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Osprey Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Osprey Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 43 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
16

Total granted

$33M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+12%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentEducationReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    INTERFAITH AMERICA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +400%
  • WA
    WATERAID AMERICA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +26%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY WATER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $350k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +39% · 38% of their budget
  • OS
    OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE BALTIMORE
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
7
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
11
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
12
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International; the most unlike its peers is Center for Emerging Media Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IRC INTERNATIONAL WATER AND SANITATION: $4,817,451 · OtherIRC INTERNATIONAL WATER AND SANITATIONCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $2,000,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESORANGE DONOR ADVISED FUND (FIDELITY): $789,744 · OtherGLEN BROOK DONOR ADVISED FUND (FIDELITY): $789,744 · OtherBLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $752,778 · OtherST MARYS SEMINARY & UNIVERSITY: $640,000 · OtherON BEING PROJECT: $950,000 · OtherON BEING PROJECT+24 more: $5,272,012 · Other+24 moreUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $1,650,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INCWATERAID AMERICA INC: $1,607,500 · InternationalWATERAID AMERICA INCCORUS SOLUTIONS INC: $1,145,000 · InternationalCORUS SOLUTIONS INCLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $1,000,000 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INCCEDEPCA USA: $775,000 · InternationalCEDEPCA USASANERGY INC: $772,717 · InternationalSANERGY INCWATER FOR PEOPLE: $650,000 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLEACUMEN FUND INC: $550,000 · InternationalACUMEN FUND INCFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $550,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC+7 more: $905,000 · International+7 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,525,000 · EducationWELL FOR THE JOURNEY INC: $490,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH STUDIES INC: $430,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $200,000 · EducationSIDE BY SIDE INCORPORATED: $120,000 · EducationSPLASH INTERNATIONAL: $1,139,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · EnvironmentBURN DESIGN LAB: $385,000 · EnvironmentSAFE WATER NETWORK: $376,717 · EnvironmentSAHA GLOBAL INC: $100,000 · Environment+2 more: $56,500 · EnvironmentINTERFAITH AMERICA: $2,025,000 · ReligionCONVERGENCE NETWORK INC: $300,000 · Religion+1 more: $50,000 · ReligionINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $1,295,874 · Human Services+1 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $903,325 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC: $279,744 · Philanthropy+3 more: $16,750 · Philanthropy
Other$16,011,729International$9,605,217Education$2,765,000Environment$2,557,217Religion$2,375,000Human Services$1,325,874Philanthropy$1,199,819

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERFAITH AMERICA: $2,025,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $1,650,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $1,607,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,525,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $1,295,874 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCORUS SOLUTIONS INC: $1,145,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetSPLASH INTERNATIONAL: $1,139,000 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetON BEING PROJECT: $950,000 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $903,325 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCEDEPCA USA: $775,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetSANERGY INC: $772,717 over 3y, 11% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $650,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC: $550,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $550,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWELL FOR THE JOURNEY INC: $490,000 over 7y, 40% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH STUDIES INC: $430,000 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetBURN DESIGN LAB: $385,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetSAFE WATER NETWORK: $376,717 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCONVERGENCE NETWORK INC: $300,000 over 4y, 73% of budgetWATER FOR GOOD: $300,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC: $279,744 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $200,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM: $145,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSIDE BY SIDE INCORPORATED: $120,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetSAHA GLOBAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $55,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE ECUMENICAL INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER4 INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT'L INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR EMERGING MEDIA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERFAITH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERAID AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CORUS SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPLASH INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds ON BEING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDEPCA USA ↗
  • Who funds SANERGY INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WELL FOR THE JOURNEY INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC CHRISTIAN AND JEWISH STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BURN DESIGN LAB ↗
  • Who funds SAFE WATER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CONVERGENCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD13× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Osprey Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Osprey Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Osprey Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Osprey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Osprey’s filings →

More from the funding graph