Skip to content

· Private foundation

The OShea Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$377k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.7MHuman Services$504kReligion$323kPhilanthropy$254kHousing & Shelter$130kHealth$92kYouth Development$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $209k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
De Marillac Academy$72,550
St Peter School$52,500
ICA Cristo Rey Academy$45,000
St Vincent de Paul - San Francisco$35,000
Come to Believe Network$25,000
St Anthony Foundation$18,000
Salesian Boys Club$15,700
Riordan High School$15,000
St Ignatius$15,000
Mercy Housing of California$10,000
Holy Family Day Home$10,000
Sacred Heart Schools$10,000
Homeless Prenatal Program$10,000
USF$5,000
Father Sauer Academy$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SVDP - Catherine's Center: $10k → 7%Epiphany Center: $3k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $16k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $15k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $12k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $10k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $10k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $10k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $10k → 10%Holy Family Day Home: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 39 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
15

Total granted

$2.9M
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+13%

Still filing today

28%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $129k · revenue +17%
  • CT
    COME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +92%
  • University of San Francisco
    6× · 2017–2023 · $95k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • MC
    Mercy Center
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • SO
    School of the Sacred Heart Atherton
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
3
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
4
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
5
St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc

St. Mary's Center for Women and Children (SMC), a multi-service organization supporting women, children, and families, believes shelter is not enough to erase the devastation of cyclical poverty and homelessness.Grounded in social justice,…

Unclassified
6
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
Santos Manuel Student Union of Csusb

The student union, through its programs and facilities, is a focal point of the campus through assisting in the retention and development of students while encouraging a deeper understanding and appreciation of cultural pluralism, gender…

Education
9
The Sobrato Foundation

The Sobrato Foundation supports nonprofits and social impact organizations serving at-risk and vulnerable members of our community. The Foundation also makes investments to support philanthropic activities recommended by individual Sobrato…

Philanthropy
10
Sv Home

Driving the creation of affordable housing for a more vibrant and equitable silicon valley.

Housing & Shelter
11
Cristo Rey San Jose High School

Cristo rey san jose is a jesuit, catholic college-prep high school that combines rigorous academics with professional work internships, preparing students from underserved communities in silicon valley to (see schedule o)pursue college and…

Education
12
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is The Little Spanish English School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

De Marillac Academy: $322,050 · OtherDe Marillac AcademyIMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMY: $287,500 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION ACADEMYSt Peter School: $222,500 · OtherSt Peter SchoolDeMarillac School: $172,500 · OtherDeMarillac SchoolSt Vincent de Paul - SF: $164,690 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul - SFDOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE: $127,500 · OtherSt Peters School: $115,400 · OtherMercy Housing of California: $115,000 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul - San Francisco: $113,500 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $104,750 · OtherCOME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Other+33 more: $603,500 · Other+33 moreFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $128,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $77,250 · Philanthropy+1 more: $7,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of San Francisco: $95,000 · EducationSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $36,000 · EducationThe Little Spanish English School: $6,500 · EducationHOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $88,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $86,500 · HealthSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $44,200 · Youth DevelopmentMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,448,890Philanthropy$212,750Education$137,500Human Services$100,500Health$86,500Youth Development$44,200Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $128,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $95,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $88,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $86,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $77,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $44,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $36,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL: $32,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVilla Siena Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE ↗
  • Who funds COME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE GUBBIO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Carl Gellert and Celia Berta Gellert FoundationCA26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Carl Gellert and Celia Berta Gellert Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Trust Funds Incorporated · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Joseph & Mercedes McMicking Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Yvonne and Angelo Sangiacomo Family Foundation · Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main · The Stanley S Langendorf Foundation · McNabb Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The OShea Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The OShea Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The OShea Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The OShea Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on OShea’s filings →

    More from the funding graph