· Private foundation
The Osen Hunter Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k2 grants · $4k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SANDBOX AT MADELINE'S PLACE | $45,000 |
| TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH | $22,734 |
| CAMO CARES - HUNT OF A LIFETIME | $20,000 |
| PSA | $15,000 |
| CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY | $12,500 |
| HOUSE OF MERCY | $10,000 |
| SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DRAGON FOOTBALL CLUB | $3,000 |
| GREEN COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · $59k · revenue +125%
- SFSEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +299%
- USUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +219%
Funded once
- OCORANGE COUNTY CHILDRENS TOY BOXone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +8%
- SFSPOOKSTOCK FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +225%
- SASTANARDSVILLE AREA REVITALIZATION PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote and raise funds for the virginia war memorial, a state agency of virginia, which was created for the purpose of honoring patriotic virginians who rendered faithful service and sacrifice in the cause of freedom and liberty for…
Families of the wounded fund, inc (fotwf) provides financial assistance to families of service members or us agents who were wounded in combat or injured in support of combat operations while the wounded receive treatment at various…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The science museum of virginia foundation, inc. serves as the private fundraising partner of the science museum of virginia, a state institution that was founded in 1970 by both the virginia academy of science and the virginia general…
Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.
Our military kids offers extracurricular activity grants to children (1 - 18) when a parent is deployed with the national guard or the reserve or recovering from post 9/11 combat injuries.
Troops Direct augments the United States military supply chain by providing American forces with critically needed items that cannot be accessed through conventional government channels.
The Medal of Honor Foundation's mission and purpose is to provide funds to support the Congressional Medal of Honor Society. In doing so, the Foundation supports the Society in advancing their mission to perpetuate the Medal of Honor's…
Food for others provides free groceries to community members experiencing food insecurity in northern virginia. food for others also partners with other nonprofits and community-based organizations to distribute food.
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
Vsa represents sheriffs and their staff on criminal justice issues on a state level and provides information about emerging law enforcement issues, corrections and crime prevention to sheriff's offices and the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANDBOX AT MADELINES PLACE ↗
- Who funds CIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMO CARES ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Development Council of Greene County ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY CHILDRENS TOY BOX ↗
- Who funds SPOOKSTOCK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISA LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds GREENE CARE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds DeliverFund ↗
- Who funds Dominion Ridge Academy ↗
- Who funds VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE NAKED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Medical Missionaries Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMAN COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sentara Health · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Osen Hunter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Academy Art Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.