Skip to content

· Public charity

The Opportunity Institute

THE OPPORTUNITY INSTITUTE is a non-profit organization that promotes social mobility and equity by improving outcomes from early childhood through early career.

$297k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Crime & Legal$932kYouth Development$858kEducation$543kPublic Benefit$109kCommunity Improvement$11k
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $280,909, the rows itemized in this filing. The $296,689 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,780 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE FUTURES FOUNDATION$109,108
KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$25,000
SHASTA COLLEGE$25,000
CHAFFEY COLLEGE$25,000
STREET SCHOLARS-THE GAMBLE INSTITUTE$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
CAL STATE LA UNIVERSITY AUXILIARY SERVICES INC$25,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$11,206
CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY$10,595
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%COLLEGE FUTURES FOUNDATION: $109k → 10%San Francisco Sheriff's Department Five Keys Charter Schools: $250k → 10%Chaffey Community College: $115k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $11k → 14%Bakersfield College: $155k → 18%Merritt College: $172k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FIVE KEYS CHARTER SCHOOLS: $25k → 10%CHAFFEY COLLEGE: $25k → 14%California State University Los Angeles: $232k → 14%KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $365k → 18%STREET SCHOLARS-THE GAMBLE INSTITUTE: $25k → 10%San Francisco State University: $513k → 10%CAL STATE LA UNIVERSITY AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $25k → 18%SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 7 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$2.3M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+111%

Still filing today

29%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20
EducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2020 · $538k
  • KC
    KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
    2× · 2017–2019 · $520k
  • SJ
    SHASTA-TEHAMA-TRINITY JNT CCD
    3× · 2017–2020 · $395k

Funded once

  • CF
    COLLEGE FUTURES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $109k · revenue +145%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +111%
  • CF
    CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY: $537,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITYKERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $520,126 · OtherKERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTSHASTA-TEHAMA-TRINITY JNT CCD: $395,470 · OtherSHASTA-TEHAMA-TRINITY JNT CCDFRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS FUNDRAISING BOARD: $196,726 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS FUNDRAISING BOARDCHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $140,000 · OtherCHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS: $275,000 · EducationFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PRO…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $256,984 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSI…+1 more: $10,595 · EducationCOLLEGE FUTURES FOUNDATION: $109,108 · Public BenefitCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $11,206 · Community Improvement
Other$1,789,822Education$542,579Public Benefit$109,108Community Improvement$11,206

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS: $275,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $256,984 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS FUNDRAISING BOARD: $196,726 over 2y, 86% of budgetCOLLEGE FUTURES FOUNDATION: $109,108 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $11,206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY: $10,595 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for California Community CollegesCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for California Community Colleges · California Humanities · The James Irvine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Opportunity Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Opportunity Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Opportunity Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph