Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Opportunity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$527k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$1.9MPublic Benefit$1.3MHealth$28kEducation$20kHuman Services$18kHousing & Shelter$10kAnimals$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$225,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$300,000
CATO INSTITUTE$225,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH$1,000
PRINCETON FIRST AID AND RESCUE SQUAD$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
NJ
CT
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 8 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$3.2M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+51%

Still filing today

88%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +57%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +88%
  • PF
    PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CM
    CARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • Chicago Zoological Societygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
4
Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments

Conduct independent nonpartisan research on u.s. defense policy, military strategy, defense spending, and defense economic policies, disseminate the results to policymakers, public opinion leaders and other defense professionals.

Public Benefit
5
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
6
American Political Science Association

The american political science association ("apsa") supports excellence in scholarship and teaching and informed discourse about politics, policy, and civic participation. the association promotes a lively, diverse community of scholars,…

Social Science
7
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
12
American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Asps promotes the highest standards in advocacy, research, education, patient safety, and ethical standards for plastic surgery, our members, and their patients.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Council On Science and Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,915,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICECATO INSTITUTE: $1,275,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE+2 more: $11,000 · Public BenefitHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH: $9,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS: $4,000 · OtherPRINCETON PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · OtherCARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $10,000 · HealthPRINCETON FIRST AID AND RESCUE SQUAD: $9,000 · HealthPROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $14,000 · Human ServicesChicago Zoological Society: $10,000 · Animals
Civil Rights$1,915,000Public Benefit$1,286,000Other$24,000Education$20,000Health$19,000Human Services$14,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,915,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,275,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $14,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON FIRST AID AND RESCUE SQUAD: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON FIRST AID AND RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Opportunity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Opportunity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Opportunity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph