Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Once Here Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$2.3MPhilanthropy$2.0MEducation$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.5MCrime & Legal$1.2MYouth Development$900kInternational$725kArts & Culture$525kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $900k
$150,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$900,000
Harvard Divinity School$225,000
Massachusetts General Hospital$200,000
Shooting Touch$200,000
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$150,000
Friends of Matenwa Inc$150,000
Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc$150,000
Concord Prison Outreach Inc$125,000
Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corporation$125,000
Camp Jabberwocky$125,000
Calling All Crows$125,000
Lovelane Special Needs Horseback Riding Program$100,000
United South End Settlements$100,000
Curious Learning A Global Literacy Project Inc$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $100k → 8%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $100k → 16%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $100k → 8%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $100k → 16%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $100k → 8%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $100k → 16%United South End Settlements: $100k → 16%United South End Settlements: $100k → 16%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $50k → 8%Friends of Matenwa Inc: $150k → 8%Friends of Matenwa Inc: $125k → 8%FRIENDS OF MATENWA: $100k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CO
VA
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.4M · 18 repeat orgs$766k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +129% since the first grant, against -21% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$8.4M
$566k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+129%
-21%

Still filing today

67%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SHOOTING TOUCH INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $745k · revenue +7%
  • MOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $675k · revenue +318%
  • LD
    LOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP
    7× · 2018–2024 · $575k · revenue +154%

Funded once

  • MF
    MGH Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • CG
    CONCORDIA GENERAL CONTRACTING PAY'T
    one grant, 2018 · $113k
  • WF
    WELLINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
3
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
6
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

9
William James College Inc

William james college strives to be a preeminent college of psychology that integrates rigorous academic instruction with extensive field education and close attention to professional development. we assume an ongoing social responsibility…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

12
Harmony Labs Inc

Harmony labs aims to promote and advance research and understanding of how media influence works within society and partners with relevant stakeholders, including research, industry and media practicioners to address knowledge gaps and to…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United South End Settlements and the most unlike its peers is Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $1,100,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITALMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC — $720,000 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INCMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $475,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIndividual grant recipient — $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOVELANE — $225,000 · OtherMassachusetts General Hospital — $200,000 · OtherMGH Foundation — $200,000 · OtherLOVELANE SPECIAL NEEDS HORSEBACK RIDING PROGRAM INC — $175,000 · OtherCALLING ALL CROWS INC — $525,000 · OtherCALLING ALL CROWS INCWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION — $325,000 · OtherWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION+14 more — $626,659 · Other+14 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHA…MOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC — $675,000 · Community ImprovementMOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND …President and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,425,000 · EducationPresident and Fel…CURIOUS LEARNING A GLOBAL LITERACY PROJECT INC — $550,000 · EducationCURIOUS LEARNING …FRIENDS OF MATENWA INC — $725,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF …UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS — $500,000 · Human ServicesUNITED SOUT…SHOOTING TOUCH INC — $745,000 · Recreation & SportsLOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP — $575,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONCORD PRISON OUTREACH INC — $525,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,871,659Community Improvement$2,675,000Education$1,975,000Human Services$1,225,000Recreation & Sports$745,000Youth Development$575,000Crime & Legal$525,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $2,000,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $1,425,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHOOTING TOUCH INC — $745,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetFRIENDS OF MATENWA INC — $725,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC — $720,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetMOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC — $675,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetLOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP — $575,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetCURIOUS LEARNING A GLOBAL LITERACY PROJECT INC — $550,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetCONCORD PRISON OUTREACH INC — $525,000 over 7y, 42% of budgetCALLING ALL CROWS INC — $525,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS — $500,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetWELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION — $325,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetLOVELANE SPECIAL NEEDS HORSEBACK RIDING PROGRAM INC — $175,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetCAMBRIDGE HOUSE FOR INNER PEACE INC — $160,680 over 3y, 98% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds SHOOTING TOUCH INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MATENWA INC
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC
  • Who funds MOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC
  • Who funds LOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP
  • Who funds CURIOUS LEARNING A GLOBAL LITERACY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds CONCORD PRISON OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds CALLING ALL CROWS INC
  • Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS
  • Who funds WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LOVELANE SPECIAL NEEDS HORSEBACK RIDING PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE HOUSE FOR INNER PEACE INC
  • Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Giving Grousbeck Fazzalari Dated April 20 2011 · Boston After School & Beyond Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Once Here Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 32%
  • Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc43% of income from government
  • Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp32% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Once Here Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Once Here Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph