Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Oda Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Public Benefit$86kHealth$66kArts & Culture$30kReligion$25kHuman Services$10kCrime & Legal$9kEducation$7kCivil Rights$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$798k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$5,000
ORANGE COUNTY BUDDHIST CHURCH$3,500
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$2,500
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$2,500
EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION$2,500
GRASSROOTS INSTITUTE OF HAWAII$2,500
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$2,000
VON MISES INSTITUTE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMAC FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%AMAC FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%AMAC FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OH
CA
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
HI
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 29 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
11

Total granted

$188k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+1%

Still filing today

59%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitEducationHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +65%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $26k · revenue +78%
  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • GI
    GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +45%
  • DH
    DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -19%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
3
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…

—
4
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
5
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
6
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
7
The Liberal Patriot Inc

The liberal patriot (tlp) is a digital newsletter focused on american politics and public policy. tlp aims to provide readers with honest analysis and original commentary to help advance a vital center perspective in american life.

Civil Rights
8
Allbritton Journalism Institute

Allbritton journalism institute aims to train a new generation of non-partisan political reporters from diverse backgrounds to produce high-quality, fact-based journalism.

Education
9
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
American Press Institute Inc

American press institute acts as a scout on the frontier of technology and audience behavior to identify where change is occurring and helps news organizations learn how to implement and scale that change successfully so they have a…

Arts & Culture
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Queens Best Stumpy Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORANGE COUNTY BUDDHIST CHURCH: $24,500 · OtherORANGE COUNTY BUDDHIST CHURCHPROJECT VERITAS: $13,000 · OtherPROJECT VERITASGRASSROOTS INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $7,500 · OtherGRASSROOTS INSTITUTE OF HAWAIIORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASS: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherVON MISES INSTITUTE: $3,000 · OtherFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $3,000 · OtherSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $3,000 · Other+15 more: $18,718 · Other+15 moreTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $27,500 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $26,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCLeadership Institute: $9,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute+3 more: $3,500 · Public BenefitMAYO CLINIC: $43,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,800 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONJupiter Medical Center Inc: $7,000 · HealthJupiter Medical Center IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH …MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationConservative Partnership Institute: $3,000 · EducationKHAN ACADEMY INC: $2,250 · EducationALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $1,250 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationPacific Legal Foundation: $9,000 · Crime & LegalAMAC Foundation Inc: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$79,718Public Benefit$66,000Health$63,300Arts & Culture$16,500Education$10,250Crime & Legal$9,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $43,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $26,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMAC Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQueens Best Stumpy Dog Rescue: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE EPOCH TIMES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMAC Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Queens Best Stumpy Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Oda Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Oda Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oda Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph