· Public charity
The Oasis Institute
Oasis is a national educational organization designed to empower the lives of older adults, and includes a national network of oasis programs in more than 250 communities through seven education centers and a national network of over 800 partners in 47 states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OASIS - SAN ANTONIO | $52,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $459k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSAN DIEGO OASIS4× · 2017–2020 · $349k · revenue +182%
- SASAN ANTONIO OASIS5× · 2017–2021 · $271k · revenue +23%
- AOALBUQUERQUE OASIS4× · 2017–2020 · $215k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- PRPACIFIC REGION OASISone grant, 2017 · $26k
- EIELDERSERVE INCone grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue -72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote successful aging for adults age 50 and older through lifelong learning, health programs and volunteer engagement. our vision is that adults age 50 plus have opportunities to pursue vibrant, healthy, productive and meaningful…
Oasis is a local volunteer-driven, membership oriented organization founded by local seniors to serve other seniors in northern santa barbara county. oasis has become a refuge and a relief, indeed, a sweet blessing for thousands of local…
The mission of the organization is to provide comprehensive, coordinated systems of services to assist older persons to maintain independence in their homes and their communities as long as possible.
The organization's mission is to work with people, communities, and organizations to educate, prepare, and assist them in meeting the needs of the aging.the organization's vision is to be the recognized community leader in providing…
The area agency on aging, planning and service area 2 improves the quality of life for the older adults in its nine-county community by advocating for individuals, developing and supporting a strong network of services, and providing…
To promote the highest quality of life, area agency on aging 3 will provide access to a network of services, education, and advocacy as the region's aging and disability resource expert.
The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…
Cicoa empowers older adults, those of any age with a disability, and their caregivers by providing the innovative answers, services, and support they need to achieve the greatest possible independence, dignity, and quality of life.
Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.
The organization's mission is to champion and serve older adults and individuals with disabilities so that they remain independent and engaged within their communities.
Alternatives promotes the independence and quality of life for older adults, adults with disabilities, and their families.
To provide comprehensive and coordinated programs for senior citizens within its twelve-county service area in arkansas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Oasis and the most unlike its peers is Suburban Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN DIEGO OASIS ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO OASIS ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE OASIS ↗
- Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS OASIS ↗
- Who funds Pima Council on Aging ↗
- Who funds THE CAPITAL AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC REGION OASIS ↗
- Who funds ELDERSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds GENESEE REGION HOME CARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AARP · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Oasis Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Suburban Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.