Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Notsew Orm Sands Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$6.8MPhilanthropy$6.0MHealth$4.9MEnvironment$1.6MAnimals$550kArts & Culture$279kInternational$103k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $250k+6 grants · $9.0M
$1,000,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of St Thomas$5,250,000
University of Kent$1,250,000
Oceana Inc$1,000,000
Yale University Development$1,000,000
Maliasili Initiatives Inc$280,000
Frankfurt Zoological Society US Inc$250,000
Charities Aid Foundation America$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 65% of grant dollars ($13M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 35% that went abroad ($7.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%University of St Thomas: $5.3M → 16%Oceana Inc: $1.0M → 14%YALE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT: $1.0M → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $332k → 7%Charities Aid Foundation America: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $400k → 22%Maliasili Initiatives Inc: $280k → 10%THE KILHAM BEAR CENTER: $250k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $313k → 16%Frankfurt Zoological Society US Inc: $250k → 14%Yale University Development: $1.0M → 12%HOUSTON SPCA: $50k → 16%YALE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT: $1.0M → 12%Yale University Development: $1.0M → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 35% of all-years giving ($7.0M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$3.4M · 5 grants
Canada$3.0M · 1 grant
Peru$600k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
5
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
6
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
7
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
8
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
9
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
10
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
11
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
12
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frankfurt Zoological Society - Us Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kent Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Yale University Development: $4,000,000 · OtherYale University DevelopmentCanada Company Charitable Registration Number 838516094RR0001: $3,000,000 · OtherCanada Company Charitable Registration Number 838516094RR0001HAMSHIRE & IOW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,302,000 · OtherHAMSHIRE & IOW COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUniversity of Kent: $1,250,000 · OtherUniversity of KentHAMPSHIRE AND ISLE OF WIGHT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $609,802 · OtherINSTITUTO LIBERTAD Y DMOCRACIA: $500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $400,000 · Other+4 more: $710,539 · Other+4 moreUniversity of St Thomas: $5,562,500 · EducationUniversity of St ThomasOCEANA INC: $1,000,000 · EnvironmentMALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $280,000 · EnvironmentKENT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,102,816 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyFRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INC: $250,000 · AnimalsTHE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC: $250,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 · Animals
Other$11,772,341Education$5,562,500Environment$1,280,000Philanthropy$1,105,316Animals$550,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $5,562,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetOCEANA INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $332,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALIASILI INITIATIVES INC: $280,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INC: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC: $250,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds KENT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Notsew Orm Sands Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Notsew Orm Sands Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Notsew Orm Sands Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Notsew Orm Sands Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Notsew Orm Sands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph