Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Norton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$389k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$3.5MEducation$1.4MInternational$1.1MFood & Nutrition$668kPhilanthropy$450kHealth$437kHuman Services$401kEmployment$250kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $544k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $513k
  • $250k+1 grant · $389k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH FOR TOMORROW$388,500
Naples Children Education Fund$200,000
Holistic Haitian Alliance$113,456
Johns Hopkins University$50,000
LET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS$50,000
World Central Kitchen$50,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$50,000
Great American Community Kitchen$35,000
The ALS Association DCMDVA Chapter$25,000
FOOD N' FRIENDS$25,000
Latina Student Fund$25,000
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
Women Giving Back Inc$25,000
REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL$25,000
DC CENTRAL KITCHEN$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $296k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%CHALLENGING RACISM: $5k → 7%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $70k → 13%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 15%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $26k → 13%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $10k → 13%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $10k → 13%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $10k → 13%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $5k → 13%Food For Others: $25k → 6%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $10k → 6%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $10k → 6%Veteran Success Resource Group: $20k → 6%Veteran Success Resource Group: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 53 repeat orgs$443k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
26

Total granted

$8.3M
$331k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+57%

Still filing today

70%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YF
    YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +90%
  • HH
    Holistic Haitian Alliance
    7× · 2019–2025 · $794k · revenue +88%
  • LG
    LET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $375k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • HC
    Harry Chapin Food Bank
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • DA
    DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • SC
    SONOMA COUNTY VINTNERS
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
2
Global Citizens Public Charter School

Global citizens school's mission is to inspire and prepare the next generation or global citizens. we will do this by supporting students, ages 3-11, to reach their full academic and leadership potential in a nurturing learning…

—
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
6
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
7
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
8
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
District of Columbia College Access Program

The district of columbia college access program's (dc cap's) primary purpose is to encourage and enable district of columbia students to attend and graduate college.

Education
11
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
12
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Adaptive Fitness Legion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/62
Grantees still filing
41/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $3,097,350 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INCHolistic Haitian Alliance: $794,420 · Youth DevelopmentHolistic Haitian AllianceLET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS INC: $375,000 · Youth DevelopmentLET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS INCNaples Children Education Fund: $850,000 · OtherNaples Children Education FundSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $150,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION DCMDVA CHAPTER: $150,000 · OtherTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $145,000 · OtherST COLETTA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $140,000 · OtherTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $110,000 · OtherGREAT AMERICAN COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $113,000 · OtherArlington Food Assistance Center: $100,000 · Other+48 more: $1,099,550 · Other+48 moreNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 · PhilanthropyTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $195,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $135,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthALS UNITED NORTH CAROLINA: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $146,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 · InternationalNew Roots Haiti: $55,750 · InternationalPROJECTS FOR HAITI INC: $40,000 · InternationalLAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $136,250 · Human ServicesGUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $45,000 · Human Services360 VETERANS: $40,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesLATINO STUDENT FUND: $135,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationWashington Episcopal Day School Inc: $25,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · EducationFlint Hill School: $10,000 · EducationGENERATION HOPE: $10,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $3,000 · Education
Youth Development$4,266,770Other$2,857,550Philanthropy$540,000Health$401,000International$316,750Human Services$296,250Education$255,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC: $3,097,350 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetHolistic Haitian Alliance: $794,420 over 7y, 10% of budgetLET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS INC: $375,000 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $195,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALS ASSOCIATION DCMDVA CHAPTER: $150,000 over 6y, 61% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $146,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $145,000 over 7y, 55% of budgetST COLETTA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $140,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES: $136,250 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetLATINO STUDENT FUND: $135,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $135,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT AMERICAN COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $113,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $110,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center: $100,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFAX COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $70,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNew Roots Haiti: $55,750 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPrince William Community Foundation: $50,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECTS FOR HAITI INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Council of Northern Virginia Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS OF HOPE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWashington Episcopal Day School Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED NORTH CAROLINA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFEAR 2 FREEDOM INC: $19,700 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlint Hill School: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGENERATION HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSWAY COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Holistic Haitian Alliance ↗
  • Who funds LET'S GO BOYS AND GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds ALS ASSOCIATION DCMDVA CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST COLETTA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE TOXAWAY CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds LATINO STUDENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT AMERICAN COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRFAX COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds New Roots Haiti ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Prince William Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds 360 VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds PROJECTS FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC22× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Alloy Family Foundation Inc · The Henry Foundation Inc · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · Reinsch Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Kimsey Foundation · The Peterson Family Foundation Inc · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Norton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Norton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Norton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Norton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norton’s filings →

More from the funding graph