How much does The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd give?

The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd reported 15 grants totaling $110,219 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 21 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (44%), Religion (10%), Human Services (8%).

Who are The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: The Murphy Foundation ($140k), The Murphy Foundation ($43k), Treasure Coast Rowing Club Inc ($39k).

Does The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc, Network for Good, Paypal Charitable Giving Fund.

Where is The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd based?

The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd is based in FL.

The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd

The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd at a glance

· Private foundation

The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$43k

Largest

01What it funds

0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$393kReligion$86kHuman Services$71kInternational$51kPhilanthropy$43kRecreation & Sports$42kEducation$41kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $47k
$10k–50k3 grants · $63k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.3M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
The Murphy Foundation	$43,000
Hibiscus Children's Foundation	$10,000
Treasure Coast Wildlife Center	$10,000
The Children's Museum	$5,000
Individual grant recipient	$5,000
Airedle Terrier Rescue	$5,000
Sealyhams Forever Foundation	$5,000
Case Western Reserver University	$5,000
Hospice of Martin County	$5,000
Safe Space	$5,000
Whitetails Unlimited	$3,500
Salvation Army of Martin County	$3,000
Fairmount Temple	$2,500
YMCA of the Treasure Coast	$2,000
Temple Beit Hayam	$1,219

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$787k · 27 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$787k

$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%

+149%

Still filing today

33%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentSocial ScienceOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
Treasure Coast Rowing Club Inc
3× · 2017–2022 · $39k · revenue +39%
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +50%
SS
SAFE SPACE INC
3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +14%

Funded once

DH
DOMINO'S HOUSE
one grant, 2019 · $25k
CF
CARING FIELDS FELINES INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +60%
TC
The Childrens Museum of the Treasure Coast Incgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +149%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Murphy Foundation

Philanthropy

Jack Murphy Foundation

Philanthropy

Fischer Memorial Burial Park

—

The Anthony & Catherine Fusco Foundation

Philanthropy

Florida Animal Protection Foundation

Animals

The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation

Philanthropy

Pet Rescue Miami Inc

Animals

Frances McDonough Animal Care Fund

—

Eileen and Murray Friedman Foundation

Philanthropy

The Musser Foundation

—

Murphy Charitable Family Foundation

Philanthropy

The Fischer Family Foundation Co Timeworks International Inc

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safespace Inc; the most unlike its peers is The United Jewish Cemeteries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/15

Grantees still filing

11/15

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$577,973Animals$176,700Education$41,000Recreation & Sports$38,931Human Services$33,850Environment$9,800Social Science$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Norton and Judy Viny Private Fd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home