Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nick Traina Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$455kYouth Development$201kArts & Culture$200kHuman Services$125kHousing & Shelter$110k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM$26,250
ACCESS INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$25,000
ADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES$25,000
COUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOUTH$20,000
HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $436k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TEEN ESTEEM: $6k → 9%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $58k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $31k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $28k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $26k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $16k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $15k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $15k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAM: $6k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $25k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $25k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $20k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $20k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $20k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $15k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $15k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $15k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $15k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $15k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $15k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $15k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $10k → 10%AT THE CROSSROADS: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+54%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HY
    HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +90%
  • AC
    ADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +48%
  • AI
    Access Institute for Psychological Services
    6× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • TE
    Teen Esteemgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Almaden Valley Counseling Service Inc

Avcs is committed to meeting the mental health concerns of all ages with an emphasis on youth. avcs offers a full range of counseling services which supports and promotes personal growth, positive family relationships and emotional…

Health
2
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
3
Open Paths Counseling Center

Open paths counseling center's mission is to meet the evolving mental health needs of the community through quality counseling for individuals and families at affordable fees; free therapy programs for at-risk children and youth in local…

Health
4
Community Youth Center of San Francisco

Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…

—
5
Harm Reduction Therapy Center

Harm Reduction Therapy Center is dedicated to providing treatment to people with co-occurring substance misuse and mental illness, and training mental health, drug treatment, and social service providers who work with complex…

Health
6
Center for Youth Mental Health

The Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health exists to expand access to quality evidence-based youth mental health support as quickly as possible.

Health
7
Crisis Support Services of Alameda County

24-Hours Crisis Lines and Crisis Counseling and Community Education Programs.

Health
8
Berkeley Therapy Institute

The Organization provides three core programs:- Prescriber Mental Health Services Program is designed to provide comprehensive mental healthcare, which includes the assessment, prescription, and management of medication as needed. The…

Human Services
9
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
10
California Youth Services

We provide education, counseling, and intervention programs to support individuals and families facing substance abuse, behavioral, and mental health challenges. Our mission is to empower youth and fimilies with the skills, resources, and…

Human Services
11
Embrace Mental Health

To provide services to families and to youth with emotional disturbance in order to enable these youth to maintain family and community relationships.

Health
12
The College Preparatory School

At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Counseling and Support Services for Youth; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Suicide Prevention. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $195,024 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INCHOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $125,000 · Human ServicesHOLY FAMILY DAY HOMEAT THE CROSSROADS: $110,000 · Human ServicesAT THE CROSSROADS+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES: $170,000 · HealthADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICESAccess Institute for Psychological Services: $135,000 · HealthAccess Institute for Psychological Serv…COUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOUTH: $75,000 · HealthCOUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOU…SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $200,000 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO CONSER…SAN FRANCISCO SUICIDE PREVENTION: $75,000 · Other
Human Services$436,024Health$380,000Education$200,000Other$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $195,024 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES: $170,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetAccess Institute for Psychological Services: $135,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetHOLY FAMILY DAY HOME: $125,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAT THE CROSSROADS: $110,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SUICIDE PREVENTION: $75,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCOUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOUTH: $75,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTeen Esteem: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Access Institute for Psychological Services ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY DAY HOME ↗
  • Who funds AT THE CROSSROADS ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds COUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Teen Esteem ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Horizons Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nick Traina Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nick Traina Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Nick Traina Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Nick Traina Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nick Traina’s filings →

    More from the funding graph