Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Newman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$227kHealth$201kReligion$85kRecreation & Sports$48kArts & Culture$37kFood & Nutrition$28kHuman Services$20kScience & Tech$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL LAKE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
826 MICHIGAN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPT OF PED RHEUMATOLOGY$10,000
EASTERN MARKET$10,000
WILKINSON HOMESTEAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
RUTH ELLIS CENTER$10,000
CURE JM FOUNDATION$8,000
CONGREGATION SUKKAT SHALOM$5,000
BARN SANCTUARY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPT OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION$5,000
WARM HEARTS ORGANIZATION$5,000
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$3,500
MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION$3,000
MUNSON FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 11%MICHIGAN LEAGUE PUBLIC POLICY: $1k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE PUBLIC POLICY: $1k → 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$595k · 36 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
39

Total granted

$595k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+36%

Still filing today

47%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTH ELLIS CENTER
    5× · 2018–2024 · $47k · revenue +90%
  • CJ
    CURE JM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +11%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2018–2022 · $17k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • MD
    MI DEPT OF RESEARCH SUPPORT
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIVERSITY WM BEAUMONT
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
5
The Center for Michigan

For all state residents, diverse civic stakeholders and philanthropy, the center for michigan (the center) and its nonprofit newsrooms - bridge michigan and bridgedetroit - make michigan better through high-quality, nonpartisan journalism…

Public Benefit
6
Endeavor Detroit

Endeavor Detroit is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Michigan and the wider Great Lakes region, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in the…

Community Improvement
7
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
9
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
10
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice

The organization is known as the leader in the movement and is seen as the "go to" experts on environmental justice and sustainable redevelopment because of its knowledge and its network.

Health
11
Michigan Biotechnology Institute

Bridging the gap between early-stage innovation and commercial application. partnering to de-risk, develop and scale-up discoveries into commercially-viable technology packages.

Education
12
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breaking Walls Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KU ENDOWMENT: $110,000 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $57,500 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROITUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPT OF PED RHEUMATOLOGY: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEPT OF PED RHEUMATOLOGYIndividual grant recipient: $21,500 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE WILLIAM BEAUMONT: $20,000 · Other+68 more: $314,944 · Other+68 moreRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $47,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $25,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionFirst Look Institute Inc: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBREAKING WALLS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCURE JM FOUNDATION: $18,250 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $13,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$578,944Recreation & Sports$59,500Education$53,000Food & Nutrition$27,500Arts & Culture$25,000Health$19,750Housing & Shelter$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $47,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCURE JM FOUNDATION: $18,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $17,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budget826 MICHIGAN INC: $15,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFirst Look Institute Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING WALLS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetMICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARN SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE ANIMAL ADOPTION SOCIETY: $2,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHIAS INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRebel Dogs Detroit Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTE YOUTH CYCLING: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MARKET CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CURE JM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds 826 MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds First Look Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKING WALLS INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BARN SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL DETROIT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI28× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Gilbert Family Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Jk Farber Family Foundation · McGregor Fund · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Newman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Newman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Newman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Newman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Newman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph