How much did THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC grant in FY2025?

THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC reported 16 grants totaling $7,362,922 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC based?

THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC is based in IL.

THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.

$7.4M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$102k

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.

Human Services$748kHousing & Shelter$273kHealth$189kCrime & Legal$110kScience & Tech$102kEmployment$85kCommunity Improvement$65kCivil Rights$60kYouth Development$40kOther$540k

02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k10 grants · $200k
$50k–250k6 grants · $456k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

RTI INTERNATIONAL$102,455
APNA GHAR INC$96,461
LIFT INC$75,000
CAWC$71,286
SARAHS INN$58,346
INSTITUTE FOR NON-VIOLENCE CH$52,253
INELLAS RESTORATION CENTER$20,000
WOMENS JUSTICE INSTITUTE$20,000
DVSA COMMUNITIES$20,000
ERNESTINES DAUGHTER$20,000
UN NUEVO DESPERTAR$20,000
EMPOWERING WOMEN NFP$20,000
AND RISE WOMAN INC$20,000
AMAN HUMAN SERVICES$20,000
LOVE AND PROTECT WISDOM$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $698k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$373k · 4 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +150% since the first grant, against +102% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$373k

$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+150%

+102%

Still filing today

100%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $410k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AG
Apna Ghar Inc
2× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +247%
C
CAWC
2× · 2023–2025 · $110k · revenue +150%
SI
Sarahs Inn
2× · 2023–2025 · $83k · revenue +103%

Funded once

A
ANEWgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $68k · revenue +118%
CF
Center for Advancing Domesticgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $67k · revenue +116%
BP
Brighton Park Neighborhood Cograduated
one grant, 2023 · $65k · revenue +189%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Network Advocating Against Domestic

Human Services

Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault

The agency provides services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault including crisis intervention, safety planning, medical and legal advocacy, adult and youth support groups, and community prevention education. the agency…

Health

Domestic Abusesexual Assault

Provide free, confidential and empowering services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking while raising awareness and prevention efforts throughout our communities.

Human Services

Domestic Violence

The Organization provides direct services to victims and their families who are impacted by violent crime. These services include access to a 24 hour crisis line, shelter for those in imminent danger, support groups, advocacy assistance…

Human Services

Domestic Abuse Intervention

Domestic abuse intervention programs is a nonprofit agency that works towards the elimination of violence in the lives of women and their children.

Human Services

Domestic Violence Services Network Inc

DVSN works in collaboration with communities to end domestic violence We strive to empower and educate all peoples in ways that respect their dignity and choices while promoting their safety.

Crime & Legal

Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health

Chicago Torture Justice Center

Seeks to address the traumas of police violence and institutionalized racism through access to healing and wellness services, trauma-informed resources, and community connection. The Center is a part of and supports a movement to end all…

Crime & Legal

Center for Domestic Peace

Center for Domestic Peace mobilizes individuals and communities to transform our world so domestic violence no longer exists, creating greater safety, justice, and equality.

Human Services

Domestic and Sexual Violence Services

To empower those impacted by violence & foster healthy relationships.

Human Services

Domestic Abuse Council of

Assist victims of domestic violence

Human Services

Womens Information Services Inc

To provide advocacy, safety options and support services to survivors of domestic violence and adult sexual assault.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pillars Community Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3/58

the rest of the field

14%

4,317/31,452

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

48/49

Grantees still filing

46/49

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$748,242Other$704,069Housing & Shelter$272,657Health$188,767Crime & Legal$110,082Science & Tech$102,455Employment$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL55.3× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Chicago Foundation for Women · Illinois Coalition Against Domestic · The Chicago Community Trust · Michael Reese Health Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Alphawood Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · Crossroads Fund Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur · Field Foundation of Illinois

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LOVE AND PROTECT WISDOM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 933225409 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LOVE AND PROTECT WISDOM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Network Advocating Against Domestic?

Find your warmest path to The Network Advocating Against Domestic through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Network Advocating Against Domestic?

More from the funding graph

THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

49 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Network Advocating Against Domestic?

More from the funding graph